Emily Richardson
Active Member
Maybe creators will get notified on October 28 and asked if they want to join.Tech Crunch says YouTube will disable monetization if you don't agree to be part of YouTube Red. How do you agree though?
Maybe creators will get notified on October 28 and asked if they want to join.Tech Crunch says YouTube will disable monetization if you don't agree to be part of YouTube Red. How do you agree though?
Maybe creators will get notified on October 28 and asked if they want to join.
I'm not particularly concerned because, I mean... Who actually invests money in something thats free? Thats so 1990s.
Plus, pretty sure anyone who would care enough to buy that would already be using adblock.
This is one of those shiny badges companies tack onto themselves to earn PR points, even if it doesn't actually do anything.
The only thing anyone should be concerned with is that youtube is finally experimenting with getting people to pay to use services on their website. It's a small aspect now, but everything starts small.
This might help with revenue for some content creators. A 1000 views usually equals to $1-$5, but with RED you can make a lot more it just depends on how long people watch you. If 1000 people are subscribed to 20 channels and they watch all the channels equally, each channel will get $250.[DOUBLEPOST=1445470060,1445469972][/DOUBLEPOST]
Google is working on stopping adblock from working on Youtube.[DOUBLEPOST=1445470271][/DOUBLEPOST]
I agree with you ad-blockers dose not help Youtube or content creators, they only slow down the growth of Youtubers. RED is only going to help smaller channels.
I think it will affect it in some way, I mean there will definitely be less ad clicks (because some of the people who were clicking on ads will no longer be seeing them), so some of that subscription revenue will definitely be coming our way, I really don't see how it couldn't change.
Also yeah we'll have to see about adblock, I think if Google was to block it or something like that they would be pretty quite about it (although I'm sure the internet won't be quiet).
Ive also heard a lot of rumors and Id like to know if they are true or not, such as if we the creators OPT OUT of the service YouTube will set our videos to private. So does that mean we have to pay the 9.99 too? If not why would they offer an opt out?
I think I heard that for the YouTube Red users that view our channels, if an ad were to play from that playback that was bypassed by YouTube Red - we still get the revenue as if YouTube Red did not exist.
I don't think YouTube would risk screwing over the smaller channels that have potential to be bigger and bring in more site traffic. Wouldn't make any sense from a business point of view.
Right? This is exactly what I got from it. YouTube said it themselves, via their blog, that they don't want to get rid of their free, ad-supported site. So if this is the case, it would be unfair that you couldn't upload anymore publically and still have a free, ad-supported site anyways. Netflix doesn't do that at all. In fact, you can't watch anything without a subscription to Netflix, so this is not like that at all. It's just a matter of if other people want to purchase that subscription or not and the fact that YouTube wants to get it on the record that they can use your product for YT Red.I think they mean you have to agree to the terms of making your channel videos eligible for the subscription service. Not that you need to purchase the subscription yourself.
Here's the Tech Crunch article:
http://techcrunch.com/2015/10/21/an-offer-creators-cant-refuse/