CousinEd
There's always a choice
There is a substantial difference between h3h3's and Suzy lu's reaction videos. If she was taken to the court... oh my.H3h3 says it’s ok.
There is a substantial difference between h3h3's and Suzy lu's reaction videos. If she was taken to the court... oh my.H3h3 says it’s ok.
Well I don’t know. I don’t watch either. But if you’re big enough you get your way. Case in point this post!There is a substantial difference between h3h3's and Suzy lu's reaction videos. If she was taken to the court... oh my.
You think h3h3's opponent in the court was just a small, poor guy?But if you’re big enough you get your way.
Then why do you even comment?Well I don’t know. I don’t watch either.
Is it hard to obtain YouTube certified? Haven't looked into this.getting YouTube certified and acquiring ContentID.
I would say it's very hard (next to impossible). I was applying for it since 2012 and heard back from YouTube just last month. Then I had to take a serious exam for which I studied 2 hard weeks (without getting out like in the good old times of the university). But in the long run it was worth it (The wait and the studying).Is it hard to obtain YouTube certified? Haven't looked into this.
Did you have to travel to a certain place to take the exam? Or was it an online type exam?I would say it's very hard (next to impossible). I was applying for it since 2012 and heard back from YouTube just last month. Then I had to take a serious exam for which I studied 2 hard weeks (without getting out like in the good old times of the university). But in the long run it was worth it (The wait and the studying).
I understand. Then I still wonder what the OP should put as the reason the takedown was invalid.To be clear, I'm not on OP's side nor the original "reactor's" side in this matter. And I also agree that both the reactor and the owner of the trailer can request to strike OP's video down, but I do believe, in this particular matter, only the original owner should use the magic strike button.
How do you get "owner of the whole content" from the thing she had to have signed? She's the owner of the content that she included, even if it was only 0.1% of the OP's video.Back to the topic, When that Suzy something filled the DMCA compliant she checked and signed the following:
“I have a good faith belief that the use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.”
How she knows?
"The information in this notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.”
She is not the owner of the whole content if there are parts of the original video to which she reacted.
So in fact she abused the DMCA takedown form and violated the copyright law. She initiated a legal process for a content for which she may not fully owns all the rights.