official statement https://youtube.googleblog.com/
100 mil is noothing. i think kid content generates youtube 1 billion a yearCould this be an attempt to be more like network television? Where on TV you can have shows for children funded by commercials. Because isn’t that what you would try to do if you still want to have it all. I think the only difference between youtube and TV is the tracking and personalized commercials. Maybe take the intelligence out of Youtube and dumb it down so they capitalize on childrens content just like television? 100 million isnt nearly enough to replace all the kids channels. Especially all the big ones. It would be shocking if they decided to kill off cocomelon and ryantoysreview. Perhaps they are trying to convert those channels into television style advertising.
there will be an a dip. but i am pretty sure toy companies, cereal and gaming companies will adjust their ad settings for these changes. When you advertise on google ads you can choose the video you want to advertise on, the channel, keywords (search), audience (this is personalized), demographics (personalized), and topics. So there are ways for toy/gaming companies and cereal companies to target general info like categories, search keywords, and they can still target fgteev ryantoysreview cocomelon etc.I talked to some people who did some tests so with personalized ads turned off you barely have any prerolls. So they think the loss will be 50-80% and not 10% like one article said
"We are changing how we treat data for children’s content on YouTube. Starting in about four months, we will treat data from anyone watching children’s content on YouTube as coming from a child, regardless of the age of the user. "
I can imagine what the revenue in January will be
"We will also stop serving personalized ads on this content entirely, and some features will no longer be available on this type of content, like comments and notifications "
Wow. And subscribers won't know about new videos.