Do you have a source for that ?Can't say that I really care, considering how they kicked some people off the rewind list due to not "willingly" supporting Clinton in the election, which was a ridiculous thing to do as a company.
Don't remember which video it was in, but Philly D, big media news youtube guy, he merely mentioned it in one video how YouTube removed him off the rewind due to his comments about not supporting either candidate in the election (this was sometime after Neistat's "VOTE for Hillary or else..." video. ) prior to this he was scheduled to be on the roster for the rewind, but apparently the big guys didn't like it. He didn't go into more details since he is under contract by his network and all that, but it's a pretty clear-cut thing imo.Do you have a source for that ?
It sounds too ridiculous to be true - this would be a dangerous thing to do.
A search enginge and news source that wants to push an ideology is crazyly scary considering the influence the search results of google have.
I think its quite obvious that silicon valley companys are democraticly orientated as most influencial people there are californian/NY liberals and both parties are equally corporatist.Don't remember which video it was in, but Philly D, big media news youtube guy, he merely mentioned it in one video how YouTube removed him off the rewind due to his comments about not supporting either candidate in the election (this was sometime after Neistat's "VOTE for Hillary or else..." video. ) prior to this he was scheduled to be on the roster for the rewind, but apparently the big guys didn't like it. He didn't go into more details since he is under contract by his network and all that, but it's a pretty clear-cut thing imo.
Didn´t you said that you don´t care about it ?Rewind is out.
It was pretty cool for the most part, to me it looks extremely high budget but lacks the "personal" touch it used to have.
Good chunk of creators are pretty angry about it too on Twitter.