Skippable vs. Non-skippable ads: which to use?

babyteeth4

Taking over the world... ...one kid at a time!
Has anyone done any testing to see whether non-skippable ads are worth it? Non-skippable ads are supposed to give you higher CPM but the risk in using them is that the viewer might abandon the video because they don't feel like sitting through a non-skippable ad.

I don't want to anger my viewers so I am hesitant to use non-skippable ads (also called "Standard In-Stream Ads"). On the other hand, I don't know how much serious money I'm leaving on the table by not choosing this option. Has anyone done any experimenting with this, and what were the results? Was the higher CPM worth the potential loss of viewers?

Any advice, opinions or thoughts on skippable versus non-skippable ads would be appreciated!
 
I've tested it a little bit. We took a big hit on views/subs with standard in-stream. For me, it's better to only use true view because we're tiny as a channel so the money is irrelevant before we grow. In total I've earned less than $30:) But yes, I had a higher CPM with standard.[DOUBLEPOST=1413786008,1413785506][/DOUBLEPOST]To add to the above comment, the CPM was higher even when I factored in for lost views. E.g. true view in stream CPM, $1. Standard CPM $4. So a 400% increase in CPM with around a 50% decrease in views. So standard in stream net gain was a double in CPM.
 
I would say skippable ads since it gives people who view the video a choice to skip the ad and watch the video instead of the ad. So I think that having an ad that streams that you can't skip would drive people away and giving people a choice would keep views happy.
 
Adds aggravate probably everybody, unless they're really awesome, but come on, how often do we find ourselves watching them? I'd say go for skippable adds unless you found yourself in a situation where you wouldn't be losing anything at all with the indefinite ones.
 
Back
Top