Rails2Revolution
Super Poster
Hey all, hope everything is well.
I've been having multiple content ID disputes rejected in the past few months for using royalty free music purchased by networks (from back in the day when I had higher regard for MCN's). Has anyone else had experience with these problems?
Problem is when networks offer royalty free music through a third party, what the youtuber doesn't have access to is the actual licenses after making purchases, making it rather difficult to prove I used this music legally.
It also seems that consistently when my videos are claimed by "AdRevMG for Third Party", they always reject any disputes. Yet I can't find details of this third party in order to contact them.
I could appeal the many rejected disputes, but I have no actual evidence that I legally obtained the royalty free music other than the contract from the network I was in as proof that I was in said network for that period of time. Plus the fact that it's the claimant that makes the final decision whether I get a strike to my channel or not makes me very uneasy about this. I've got to say, it honestly annoys me that the claimant is the one making money of the many videos I legally used their music in, and that same entity is the one that decides whether or not your claim gets released. Isn't this a very flawed system?
How have you guys sorted out rejected content ID disputes in the past?
Also if you have any thoughts or opinions about this topic please feel free to share.
I've been having multiple content ID disputes rejected in the past few months for using royalty free music purchased by networks (from back in the day when I had higher regard for MCN's). Has anyone else had experience with these problems?
Problem is when networks offer royalty free music through a third party, what the youtuber doesn't have access to is the actual licenses after making purchases, making it rather difficult to prove I used this music legally.
It also seems that consistently when my videos are claimed by "AdRevMG for Third Party", they always reject any disputes. Yet I can't find details of this third party in order to contact them.
I could appeal the many rejected disputes, but I have no actual evidence that I legally obtained the royalty free music other than the contract from the network I was in as proof that I was in said network for that period of time. Plus the fact that it's the claimant that makes the final decision whether I get a strike to my channel or not makes me very uneasy about this. I've got to say, it honestly annoys me that the claimant is the one making money of the many videos I legally used their music in, and that same entity is the one that decides whether or not your claim gets released. Isn't this a very flawed system?
How have you guys sorted out rejected content ID disputes in the past?
Also if you have any thoughts or opinions about this topic please feel free to share.