Thrashimation Update!

[Thrashbat]

So confused. You definitely see the 'launch' of your channel as a rather grandiose event though, right?

I joined this forum 48 days ago. It has been over 5000 posts leading up to here. It has been over two years creating content leading up to this. It has been a lifetime of passion for comedy, music, and animation. So, yes

 

[Vicboss]

Must I go through my 5400 posts and find each and every instance? I feel like this is an unfair practice. I noticed you tagged 11 people in your 7 layer dip thread. I don't know how you did that when the limit is of 10...

I had a post once where I was responding to something someone else said and ended with "like this post if you want me to tag you when Thrashimation launches." You did.

i wouldn't even think twice about asking the question if you hadn't said that you are tagging people that are interested and then have people questioning why they were tagged.i just wanna make sure everything is fair. nothing is a personal attack im just observing everything.

as for me tagging 11 people. that was indeed my bad. and i've probably slipped on that a few times..but everyone that is tagged are regular viewers on our channel or if the video relates to someone i will tag them..also i've asked them to tell me if they no longer want to be tagged.

We have made threads for promotion techniques on the forum and have stated not to tag people that have nothing to do with the videos.

 

[unknown_user908234902]

I joined this forum 48 days ago. It has been over 5000 posts leading up to here. It has been over two years creating content leading up to this. It has been a lifetime of passion for comedy, music, and animation. So, yes

So why the distant 'launch' in the first place? Do you plan to hit the ground running?

 

[Vicboss]

Does it count as an infraction in the rules for tagging if you tag one person multiple times?

if the person is annoyed with multiple tags then action will most certainly be taken. if it was accidental then we'd just ask the person who made the multiple tags to apologize.

 

[Thrashbat]

So why the distant 'launch' in the first place? Do you plan to hit the ground running?

Yes we do. We are trying our hardest to finish our comedic album (well, EP or extended play), and we are attempting to stockpile as many animation as possible. YouTube begs for a consistent and active content creator, and animation is time consuming.

i wouldn't even think twice about asking the question if you hadn't said that you are tagging people that are interested and then have people questioning why they were tagged.i just wanna make sure everything is fair. nothing is a personal attack im just observing everything.

as for me tagging 11 people. that was indeed my bad. and i've probably slipped on that a few times..but everyone that is tagged are regular viewers on our channel or if the video relates to someone i will tag them..also i've asked them to tell me if they no longer want to be tagged.

We have made threads for promotion techniques on the forum and have stated not to tag people that have nothing to do with the videos.

No hard feelings. I'm very tired at this point, so I might have been a bit irritable I again apologize to those who feel they were spammed or were confused. I tried very hard to make sure you had expressed interest. And after all the time, the posts, and relationships I've made on here, the last thing I want to do is lose them through a silly argument. [DOUBLEPOST=1376361046,1376360986][/DOUBLEPOST]

if they person is annoyed with multiple tags then action will most certainly be taken. if it was accidental then we'd just ask the person who made the multiple tags to apologize.

If you think I accidentally tagged someone more than once in this thread, than I very much so apologize for that. If you're talking about your post in the hangout thread where you tagged me 80 times, then sounds like you owe me an apology, attlas.

 

[unknown_user908234902]

Haha, for sure. I'm no stranger to the workings of animation. Well, good luck to you. It shall be interesting to see what you release.

 

[scifiriot]

Have to admit, and I say this not wanting to contradict a mod and the members who've expressed a concern, but I don't see a violation here. With he obvious caveat that a moderator's job is to moderate, i.e. control the communications of the community for the good of the community at their discretion, multiple tags in a thread is not the same thing as multiple (i.e. over 10) tags in one post. Further, Thrashbat deliberately made a concerted effort to limiting tagging to people that had expressed interest in being notified of the information. I *wanted* this update, and I'm glad he tagged me as I'm sure are others.

Obviously, some people are concerned by this. But the fact is that tagging limits are not actually mentioned anywhere in the YTTalk official community rules OR in Frankie's stickied rules post. Despite that, as an active member of the community, Thrash was not only aware of this "rule" but went out of his way to attempt to abide by it/work around it within what is actually a very understandable interpretation of the guideline. If he'd tagged 100 people randomly in one post, I'd understand the concern, but I just don't see the problem here.

IF tagging 10 or fewer people in multiple posts within a thread is undesirable to this community, then I'd recommend those guidelines be clearly spelled out in the readily available community rules documents to avoid any further confusion.

Annnnd... all that said, thanks for the update, Thrash! Grats!

 

[Shendijiro]

8D

 

[Thrashbat]

Have to admit, and I say this not wanting to contradict a mod and the members who've expressed a concern, but I don't see a violation here. With he obvious caveat that a moderator's job is to moderate, i.e. control the communications of the community for the good of the community at their discretion, multiple tags in a thread is not the same thing as multiple (i.e. over 10) tags in one post. Further, Thrashbat deliberately made a concerted effort to limiting tagging to people that had expressed interest in being notified of the information. I *wanted* this update, and I'm glad he tagged me as I'm sure are others.

Obviously, some people are concerned by this. But the fact is that tagging limits are not actually mentioned anywhere in the YTTalk official community rules OR in Frankie's stickied rules post. Despite that, as an active member of the community, Thrash was not only aware of this "rule" but went out of his way to attempt to abide by it/work around it within what is actually a very understandable interpretation of the guideline. If he'd tagged 100 people randomly in one post, I'd understand the concern, but I just don't see the problem here.

IF tagging 10 or fewer people in multiple posts within a thread is undesirable to this community, then I'd recommend those guidelines be clearly spelled out in the readily available community rules documents to avoid any further confusion.

Annnnd... all that said, thanks for the update, Thrash! Grats!

8D

Thank you very much for congratulations!

 

[Kath]

Have to admit, and I say this not wanting to contradict a mod and the members who've expressed a concern, but I don't see a violation here. With he obvious caveat that a moderator's job is to moderate, i.e. control the communications of the community for the good of the community at their discretion, multiple tags in a thread is not the same thing as multiple (i.e. over 10) tags in one post. Further, Thrashbat deliberately made a concerted effort to limiting tagging to people that had expressed interest in being notified of the information. I *wanted* this update, and I'm glad he tagged me as I'm sure are others.

Obviously, some people are concerned by this. But the fact is that tagging limits are not actually mentioned anywhere in the YTTalk official community rules OR in Frankie's stickied rules post. Despite that, as an active member of the community, Thrash was not only aware of this "rule" but went out of his way to attempt to abide by it/work around it within what is actually a very understandable interpretation of the guideline. If he'd tagged 100 people randomly in one post, I'd understand the concern, but I just don't see the problem here.

IF tagging 10 or fewer people in multiple posts within a thread is undesirable to this community, then I'd recommend those guidelines be clearly spelled out in the readily available community rules documents to avoid any further confusion.

Annnnd... all that said, thanks for the update, Thrash! Grats!

I had a PM conversation with Thrashbat and advised him not to tag more than 10 people. So yes, he was aware.