Fullscreen Partnership and Small Site Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bryant said:
It was just a suggestion.
I don't appreciate you throwing that example in my face, it was just an example. Your diction was kind of hostile. It's not that I want 1 forum cash for a welcome thread, it's that as a fan of being concise and terse (this post excluded), it's making people be verbose.

But as you're the administrator, I'll respect it. I just thought I could offer a suggestion. And it wasn't a "back and forth" in the way you're putting it. You gave an example, and I responded in the same exact way you replied. If you had said earlier "It will remain that way for now, as the moderators have agreed on it", I would've dropped it. But that is not the response you gave. Instead, you gave a seemingly mocking, uninformative remark.
Click to expand...

I wasn't throwing anything in your face, I gave you both an example so you can see how short a 60 character post really is and gave you another example to answer your question, that is all, there's no hostility within my posts there. The back and forth comment was how I perceived this ending up and that is all and I didn't want that. Take it how you wish but text in forum posts can often be perceived as something they are not.
 
Michael said:
I wasn't throwing anything in your face, I gave you both an example so you can see how short a 60 character post really is and gave you another example to answer your question, that is all, there's no hostility within my posts there. The back and forth comment was how I perceived this ending up and that is all and I didn't want that. Take it how you wish but text in forum posts can often be perceived as something they are not.
Click to expand...
Well, thanks for clearing that up, anyway. I appreciate it. :]

Objectively, if anyone says "if you really want...then you can..." in response to an example that picks at the minutia rather than addressing the topic as a whole, I think that's generally taken as hostile rhetoric. Just a heads up for future posts :]
 
Bryant said:
Well, thanks for clearing that up, anyway. I appreciate it. :]

Objectively, if anyone says "if you really want...then you can..." in response to an example that picks at the minutia rather than addressing the topic as a whole, I think that's generally taken as hostile rhetoric. Just a heads up for future posts :]
Click to expand...
Are you a sociology major? If not, You should be.

And Michael I now agree, I for some reason read words, not characters, which explains my 7th of a blog post comment.
I have no need for cash, as I have enough as it is, I was only looking out for the nubs here! =]

<3 everyone.
 
AJBBB said:
Are you a sociology major? If not, You should be.

And Michael I now agree, I for some reason read words, not characters, which explains my 7th of a blog post comment.
I have no need for cash, as I have enough as it is, I was only looking out for the nubs here! =]

<3 everyone.
Click to expand...
no I was a human biology major at Stanford. Premed. Ugh.
But I used to forum a lot, and I pick apart EVERYTHING haha.
fellow nub ;P
 
Imma happey to see that a small community like this was growing everyday but now that we are partnered with fullscreen :D ITS TIME TO PAAAAAARTY!!! :DDDDDDDD
 
Sounds pretty cool! I just hope that the forum won't be biased towards Fullscreen when people ask questions about who to get a partnership with and stuff.
 
zebracloak said:
Sounds pretty cool! I just hope that the forum won't be biased towards Fullscreen when people ask questions about who to get a partnership with and stuff.
Click to expand...

Not at all, if anything most people recommend others to go with what is right for them and their channel rather than be specific :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top