Someone explain this comment for me

Frankie said:
Yeah someone on Reddit commented by looking at the thumbnail/title of my first video 'hmm looks like some whiny feminist rant, i won't waste my life on this video'.

Wrong assumption. Their loss ;)
Click to expand...

I'm not just going to be close minded. I'm going to wave that s**t in yo face like it was my victory flag.
 
Frankie said:
My most recent video in a nutshell is how divorce law in many cases is sexist towards men, favouring the woman in many ways where the man would not be favoured.

I received this comment:

"You could have summed up your entire video with 'yay, feminism' and then proceeded to shoot your middle finger at the camera. This is exactly why judges see women as victims and men as abusers. Until this narrative isn't the dominant narrative, men will never stop being screwed in sexist against men family courts."

... wut.

I'm not offended by it, I just don't GET it. His comment speaks as if the video was 'woo men get screwed over, you deserve it, give women EVERYTHING! FEMINISM YEAH!'

I wouldn't even say it was a troll comment due to what it says. I honestly can't tell if the guy a) hasn't watch the video and his basing his entire opinion on the fact I'm female and the title or b) has worded it in a confusing way and it's ME getting confused.
Click to expand...
I believe what he is basically trying to say is that because of feminism, men most of the time in cases will be portrayed as the bad guy by the judges. It sounds like he is trying to say that if it wasn't for women's rights, men might could get away with more(don't rely too much on this statement because I wasn't sure about this, but it is very possible that is what he is trying to say.) I don't agree with what he is trying to say though, I'm just the interpreter here :P
 
James Lewis said:
I believe what he is basically trying to say is that because of feminism, men most of the time in cases will be portrayed as the bad guy by the judges. It sounds like he is trying to say that if it wasn't for women's rights, men might could get away with more(don't rely too much on this statement because I wasn't sure about this, but it is very possible that is what he is trying to say.) I don't agree with what he is trying to say though, I'm just the interpreter here :p
Click to expand...


But look at it in the context that he's talking about my video. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever; my video supported men and spoke of how mistreated men are in divorce law. His comment makes it sound like I'm throwing my gender in his face and chuckling about how privileged we are :/
 
Frankie said:
But look at it in the context that he's talking about my video. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever; my video supported men and spoke of how mistreated men are in divorce law. His comment makes it sound like I'm throwing my gender in his face and chuckling about how privileged we are :/
Click to expand...

But my dear, I think that's what he believes is going on. This man is commenting as if he was asleep during a meeting, then kicked awake and said "your thoughts on the matter?"
 
Maybe it was translated from another language. Hmm, it just doesn't make sense at all. I think he's agreeing with you...? :O_o2:...?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top