Scott Manley
Member
Ok I've got myself a nice little channel, 70k subs, a few million views per month, youtube's analytics page reports a Play Based CPM north of $10 so I'm doing nicely. I keep getting approached by networks with all sorts of offers with payment splits usually in the 10-20% range, which is fine I guess, I mean it's practically an insult when I see networks trying to take higher cuts now. (I haven't signed any of the contracts, and I haven't signed an NDA so I can talk all I want about some of these deals).
Anyway inevitably they claim that increases in CPM will more than make up the for the cut they're taking, but of course nobody wants to put language enforcing that in a contract, typically we talk and they're unable to provide any evidence of increased CPM's and the deal stalls. When I go and look at the properties run by these networks they don't have any differences in the ads being served (well except with the really bad networks that seem to like putting unskippable promotional films for industrial hardware in front of cute kitten videos). I have a hard time understanding why an advertiser would choose a more expensive option considering how efficient ad targetting is and how the market is practicallyt frictionless in these modern times.
So look I'm asking for people who have joined networks, or who have experience with networks, is there any truth to these claims at all? I mean I've been approached by dozens of networks and the pitch is always the same, but the lack of evidence persists, so can anyone provide personal experience or even advice, to me on this question.
Anyway inevitably they claim that increases in CPM will more than make up the for the cut they're taking, but of course nobody wants to put language enforcing that in a contract, typically we talk and they're unable to provide any evidence of increased CPM's and the deal stalls. When I go and look at the properties run by these networks they don't have any differences in the ads being served (well except with the really bad networks that seem to like putting unskippable promotional films for industrial hardware in front of cute kitten videos). I have a hard time understanding why an advertiser would choose a more expensive option considering how efficient ad targetting is and how the market is practicallyt frictionless in these modern times.
So look I'm asking for people who have joined networks, or who have experience with networks, is there any truth to these claims at all? I mean I've been approached by dozens of networks and the pitch is always the same, but the lack of evidence persists, so can anyone provide personal experience or even advice, to me on this question.