Yeah I think you're over thinking it, I mean I notice a small difference from my editor to youtube as well but it's certainly not big enough to care about. Your trailor video looks great man, very high quality.[DOUBLEPOST=1386580517,1386579468][/DOUBLEPOST]Maybe I'm being overly critical...or I just need to film with better lighting than vague cloudy light at 4pm.
Hmm.
Hey I watched one of your videos besides the trailor. I think it is the lighting. You've got a kind of... cloudy look to the video but I don't think it's the camera, try non overhead lighting, like lamps at chest level to brighten it up.Maybe I'm being overly critical...or I just need to film with better lighting than vague cloudy light at 4pm.
Hmm.
Ah, so three-point lighting isn't so good for YouTube videos? I'll keep that in mind.Yeah I think you're over thinking it, I mean I notice a small difference from my editor to youtube as well but it's certainly not big enough to care about. Your trailor video looks great man, very high quality.[DOUBLEPOST=1386580517,1386579468][/DOUBLEPOST]
Hey I watched one of your videos besides the trailor. I think it is the lighting. You've got a kind of... cloudy look to the video but I don't think it's the camera, try non overhead lighting, like lamps at chest level to brighten it up.
Oh? I was assuming you were just using the lights in your room, like just overhead. I don't know a ton about lighting, I just know that when I use my room's normal lighting I look pretty shadowy and not so great, soon as I pop on a few lamps I'm pleased with the results. Also, cameras can have a natural hue to them. I had this one camera that made everything look kinda orange, now my camera naturally puts a blueish tint on everything. Ultimately though man, quality of picture doesn't have to be perfect. People want you to be clear, not grainy, and well lit, but does it have to look as good as ijustine's videos or toby turner's? Nah. Just don't look grainy and don't have shadows under your face and people will listen to you without getting distracted.Ah, so three-point lighting isn't so good for YouTube videos? I'll keep that in mind.
And the only video I've filmed with the DSLR so far is my latest, but that was filmed purely with natural lighting. Not very bright lighting though.
Thanks for your help!!
(and everyone elses'!)
Remember though, YT caps bitrates...... so at 1080 the bitrate can only go up to 8k, and at 720 the bitrate can only go to 5k. No matter what bitrate you render at, it will be dropped to what resolution you upload at.I don't know which video editing program you're using but some where your in export settings you should be able to see (and hopefully adjust) the bitrate you want to upload at.
Remember though, YT caps bitrates...... so at 1080 the bitrate can only go up to 8k, and at 720 the bitrate can only go to 5k. No matter what bitrate you render at, it will be dropped to what resolution you upload at.
I was just talking about rendering at the maximum of 8k, not 2k. How will you take less of a quality hit when rendering more if everything is capped At 8k for 1080? That doesn't make sense. A video recorded at 90k will look the same at it recorded at 10k when both videos are capped at 8k.Yes, but if you're rendering at 2 bitrate with an HD video, then you're screwing yourself even more. Also take into account that if you render at higher bitrates, you'll take less of a quality hit.
I was just talking about rendering at the maximum of 8k, not 2k. How will you take less of a quality hit when rendering more if everything is capped At 8k for 1080? That doesn't make sense. A video recorded at 90k will look the same at it recorded at 10k when both videos are capped at 8k.