NothingToDoCrew
YTtalk Mad
have to delete this comment for legal purposes.
Last edited:
Couldn't you have heavily branded your footage before licensing it? It furthermore seems as if you know how to create viral content but you apparently need to work on your advertising skills.
Which is in principle nothing bad if you are doing it for he money. There's only a problem when you are originally doing it for exposure and even then it can work with the proper in-built branding.You gave up all your rights and exponential benefits when giving your videos to jukin media.
Yea you are right. Definitely won't make that mistake again. . I just filmed another project that should go viral again, this time i won't make the same mistake. I studied the way they made my video grow and now i know what to do[DOUBLEPOST=1458583862,1458583696][/DOUBLEPOST]This is nearly the same exact issue from this thread yttalk . com / threads/is-this-a-good-idea.208102/
No one really understands the significance of giving up ownership of your video to someone else. What you should've done is agree to some sort of sponsorship, partnership, or freelance contribution, not just give up YOUR content for THEM, in the hopes that it'll help you. Viewers don't care about your watermark, and they don't care about seeing the video again on another channel. You gave up all your rights and exponential benefits when giving your videos to jukin media.
jukin media is always asking me for my videos, I truly don't see any benefit to sharing rights to my content at all