"Believe the hype. SSDs will give you a major performance boost. Faster booting times, faster loading times, less noise, less weight."
I agree, but I don't see it making much/any difference to editing and processing time. My Intel I5 is flat out processing and compiling with a normal HD, so I don't see how an SSD is going to improve things.
As for boot time, meeeh, has never bothered me. HD doesn't take more than a few minutes.
"Believe the hype. SSDs will give you a major performance boost. Faster booting times, faster loading times, less noise, less weight."
I agree, but I don't see it making much/any difference to editing and processing time. My Intel I5 is flat out processing and compiling with a normal HD, so I don't see how an SSD is going to improve things.
As for boot time, meeeh, has never bothered me. HD doesn't take more than a few minutes.
Your i5 CPU and HDD will be bottlenecks. Not sure what version of the i5 you have, but it is unlikely to have hyperthreading. A quad core i7 and above would help improve.
Your HDD will slow everything down too. Search for "SSD Vs HDD for video editing" on YouTube to see examples of how an SSD can improve. How much time it will save will depend on the length of the video and other factors, but an SSD will undoubtedly be quicker.
It's no surprise when you consider write times.
In my pc just now I have a Samsung 960 Evo 250gb and a Seagate 2tb Barracuda HDD.
The Samsung can, in theory, write up to 1,500 MB/s and read up to 3,200 MB/s (lots of things can stop you reaching this such as heat, other components etc).
In comparison my Seagate drive, which at 7200RPM is a decent hard drive, can do write times of around 200MB/s.
That means the Samsung has the potential to write to the disk 7.5 times quicker. Obviously, other factors will stop that from happening, but you should see a marked improvement with an SSD.
Some SSDs only have write speeds of 500MB/s or so, so the performance jump may not be as significant.
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk