@wchap001
The fact that you made the following statements shows me you know little about current monetization policy, and also that you don't know that a violation "class" isn't just about its title.
i know you dont make the rules and stuff and not aiming towards you but more towards YT company
for his case, its a drawing, but they all look different but its still a drawing thats somewhat different.
First of all, as a badge-bearing Google Product Expert in the area of YouTube,
I have no choice but to be "more towards YT company" as you've put it. I am one of the people who sit on the YouTube Support Forum answering people's YouTube issue questions, and we're required to go according to YouTube Policies; anything else would not help users solve their problems, and might actually mislead them.
Next, if instead of deciding to dismiss me out of hand as a "YouTube Hack" (even though you say you weren't aiming at me), you had
actually read the policy set I linked, you would have seen this:
"
Repetitious content. This is content that appears mass-produced in order to increase views without adding significant educational or other value. Examples include:
- Synthetic voice reads third-party content or nonsensical content
- Content on a channel with minimal changes from video to video
- Repetitive or mindless content with no additional educational value, commentary, or narrative
- Content that’s been mass-produced or generated programmatically
- Image slideshows or scrolling text with minimal or no additional narrative, commentary, or educational value
Note: You may be able to monetize third-party content if you have commercial use rights for that content, and you’re contributing to the value of that content in some way. This can include, but is not limited to, high-quality editing, adding commentary, or narrative."
As you can see, the Repetitious Content class is not just about repetition. The first part I've bolded seems in my eyes to be specifically aimed at series; and the second one is aimed at videos made by things like animated drawing software and all of the "make professional class YouTube videos" software suites touted by the Affiliate Marketing Community.
If you think about it, gamers, vloggers, car guys are all repetitious.
for gamers, its always them on a screen playing a game, but a different game. but its still the same thing.
for me its on a bike on a trail, but different trails...but its always a trail lol
Why do you think that out of the three video genres you've named, only the vloggers are actually safe? Gamers and car guys are all now being rejected on a regular basis too. Even worse; your channel isn't even safe if you were monetized years ago.
These new rules are
not from YouTube; they are from AdSense; who has also forced YouTube to declare that all YPP channels, even those who have been monetized for years, must be reviewed against the AdSense Content Quality Guidelines. Channels who don't comply with the rules will be removed from the YPP and demonetized until such time (if any) as they do comply.
I deal with people like you on the Official forum every day; and I don't need your guff on a non-official forum as well. Your knowledge of the rules is outdated, and you cannot and will not bully Google into accommodating you just because you want them to. The monetization policies are linked below, I suggest you not only read
them, but everything you can find in the Help section on what can and can't be monetized; because your channel's turn to be reviewed will come eventually.
So will mine.
When you use music generated by some Dream Track features in a l
support.google.com
. As policies keeps on changing, I am just crossing my finger.