Creativenation will not PAY. HELP!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
just checked the terms and conditions, it doesnt say nothing about reclaiming ALL earnings[DOUBLEPOST=1389559033,1389558974][/DOUBLEPOST]
What's your channel name, I'll look into why your application is held up :)
you trying to tell me bbc reclaimed my gta videos?
 
just checked the terms and conditions, it doesnt say nothing about reclaiming ALL earnings

YouTube will use the same basic defense that police organizations use in relation to seizing proceeds of crime. You don't get to make earnings on legitimate stuff through the use of illegitimate stuff. Whether it is mentioned in the terms or not explicitly is irrelevant.

If you upload significant copyrighted material (enough to get shut down for), then your earnings for any legitimate content are often held back by YouTube. The logic is simple. You used the copyrighted content as a method for generating views on other content on your channel. Thus, you are not entitled to that revenue either. It is very unlikely that any sympathy is to be had here.

To take that a step further, it is often the case that channels will upload copyrighted content in order to build a viewerbase first, deleting the copyright offending content later assuming they didn't get shut down by that point. They now have a viewerbase and didn't do any of the work needed to get it legitimately.

It's YouTube saying that they know you uploaded copyright material intentionally, and that you don't deserve to earn any money on their site. Don't act surprised.
 
YouTube will use the same basic defense that police organizations use in relation to seizing proceeds of crime. You don't get to make earnings on legitimate stuff through the use of illegitimate stuff. Whether it is mentioned in the terms or not explicitly is irrelevant.

If you upload significant copyrighted material (enough to get shut down for), then your earnings for any legitimate content are often held back by YouTube. The logic is simple. You used the copyrighted content as a method for generating views on other content on your channel. Thus, you are not entitled to that revenue either. It is very unlikely that any sympathy is to be had here.

To take that a step further, it is often the case that channels will upload copyrighted content in order to build a viewerbase first, deleting the copyright offending content later assuming they didn't get shut down by that point. They now have a viewerbase and didn't do any of the work needed to get it legitimately.

It's YouTube saying that they know you uploaded copyright material intentionally, and that you don't deserve to earn any money on their site. Don't act surprised.
i still find it hard to believe as i have been paid before from other networks after having my channel terminated

all i want is some sort of proof that 'all' my earnings were reclaimed.
 
i still find it hard to believe as i have been paid before from other networks after having my channel terminated

all i want is some sort of proof that 'all' my earnings were reclaimed.

So not only are you doing this intentionally, you've done it before. You know exactly what you're doing, probably have a number of other channels that haven't yet been shut down. And now you're bitching because somebody caught on and won't pay you. Whether that's YouTube or CN is irrelevant. I'd love to see the court battle attempt. You'd be thrown out before discovery.

Best go start another channel. Try out Freedom, I hear they'll make you managed.
 
So not only are you doing this intentionally, you've done it before. You know exactly what you're doing, probably have a number of other channels that haven't yet been shut down. And now you're bitching because somebody caught on and won't pay you. Whether that's YouTube or CN is irrelevant. I'd love to see the court battle attempt. You'd be thrown out before discovery.

Best go start another channel. Try out Freedom, I hear they'll make you managed.
so you know im right? you know how dumb the idea is of bbc reclaiming a gta video. get your facts right. they obviously have my cash.

ill be ringing youtube support or someone from the adsense team to get some answers.

and you can gtfo, seriously. give me a break acting like your all innocent. no need for your smart a** comments.

all i know is, i had some legit videos and why would anyone claim rockstars gta videos? unbelievable.
 
so you know im right? you know how dumb the idea is of bbc reclaiming a gta video. get your facts right. they obviously have my cash.

ill be ringing youtube support or someone from the adsense team to get some answers.

and you can gtfo, seriously. give me a break acting like your all innocent. no need for your smart a** comments.

all i know is, i had some legit videos and why would anyone claim rockstars gta videos? unbelievable.
Did you even get written permission? I asked this earlier.
 
so you know im right? you know how dumb the idea is of bbc reclaiming a gta video. get your facts right. they obviously have my cash.

ill be ringing youtube support or someone from the adsense team to get some answers.


Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. It is unlikely that BBC claimed your GTA videos. Far more likely is YouTube denying you any revenue due to the obvious abuse pattern you are displaying. The fact that you seem surprised by this is actually quite amusing.

Rockstar also has not given blanket permission to monetize YouTube content, but that's another discussion entire and probably unrelated to this particular "issue".
 
so you know im right? you know how dumb the idea is of bbc reclaiming a gta video. get your facts right. they obviously have my cash.

ill be ringing youtube support or someone from the adsense team to get some answers.

and you can gtfo, seriously. give me a break acting like your all innocent. no need for your smart a** comments.

all i know is, i had some legit videos and why would anyone claim rockstars gta videos? unbelievable.

Please let us know how your conversation with YouTube goes.

"Hello,

I have had multiple channels terminated by you for copyright strikes. I'm basically an ******* who tries to profit off of someone else's work but I'm not getting paid my money. I'm convinced I should be paid for uploading those videos I didn't make."

Hahahaha.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top