Again, where did I EVER say you shouldn't show clips of your channel in your channel trailer? Also, where did I ever say you should say that you're funny? What I am saying is to tell what you do on your channel and not assume people will be able to figure it out by only watching your clips. With a gaming channel, telling viewers that you only play Halo games or you specialize in FPS games or you do a variety of genres is something potential subscribers should know so they know what your channel is offering.
Actually, Number #2 only has 6,147 view and #5 has a measly 593 so they're actually do better than your video by your own standards. I didn't see any that had 300K. The closest one to that was 275K and that video was 3 years old whereas yours is only a year old.
More importantly, your phrase as ZERO searches done on it. Go to Google AdWords' Keyword Planner. When I entered in "dolphin emulator fixes", it reported "We can't display search volume charts because your keywords don't have any searches." So you're the King of the Hill of a hill no one is climbing.
Sorry, you cannot assume that. It could be part of the issue, but, as far as the 275K video goes, it could simply be that your video is a third of its age.
Says who? You?
Which is a moot point given no one searches for that phrase.
No, YouTuber1978 said EXACTLY that. He is and has been actively discouraging people from doing marketing on this forum.
As for ChineseIrish, as explained in a later post by her in this thread, she simply didn't understand what position that YouTuber1978 was truly advocating and thus was wrongly defending him.
Since many posters to this thread get that I am not saying only doing marketing, possibly it is you who isn't getting what is being said. That I have to repeat my same arguments to you and rebuttal the same points you continue to make, that might be what is going on here. Perhaps?
Yes, I can when I am not saying you should only do marketing but am and have been saying you should do both. YouTuber1978 is the one that is saying only make great content and do no marketing.
No, actually the debate moderator would have pointed out that you repeatedly miss what I've previously said (possibly even stopping the debate to reprimand you on this repeated error) and it would be counted heavily against you in the debate. Yeah, I was too on a university debating team myself.
Because you keep saying I only say to do marketing as you just did above.
What?! Where does it say YTtalk is only for those who are currently making YouTube channels and not for those who are planning on making a channel or are simply interested in the topic? That's really really odd. When I introduced myself in the "Introduce Yourself" forum and told the forum I was working on starting a YouTube channel, everyone that replied made me feel real welcomed. Did they misunderstand what I wrote like you have in this thread?
Yes, it is called research, planning, preparation and timing. What it isn't is rushing into something simply to rush into something. As doing a YouTube show isn't a life or death thing (for me at least), you can and should take your time before jumping in IF you want to do it as a business. That and I have a life outside of YouTube that I enjoy.
Also, I am looking at YouTube as my last career move but I am expecting to make another career move before then. Right now, I am waiting to hear from three groups of investors who each want me to be their marketing director. One (a restaurant chain) is right here, another is in Las Vegas, and a third is in Miami. I am holding off starting my YouTube channel until one of those offers come through or all fall through. If the Las Vegas or Miami job comes through, I don't want to start my channel here and then try to keep producing and releasing episodes during the coming move and getting used to the new job. No, what I plan to do is wait until I make the move and the job becomes routine before starting my channel.
By your same logic, I shouldn't then give marketing advice to funeral homes, bakeries, auto repair shops, restaurants, insurance companies, lawyers, construction companies, and private boarding schools because I haven't started and run one of those either. But you know what's odd about that? I have been hired by all those businesses and many more to do marketing for them. Isn't that odd? Obviously if you're right, they were wrong in hiring me, right?
The truth is that YouTube is NOT special when it comes to marketing principles. Anyone who says so simply shows they know nothing about marketing. So if you are well versed in marketing, you should be able to help YouTubers who might not be.
What I have done here is limit myself to giving marketing advice on this forum. As I've been a marketer for three decades, I feel I can confidently do so and help YouTubers who do not have the funds to hire a marketer like me to help them. I consider it pro bono work and giving something to the community I am planning to soon join. Paying it forward, so to speak. In fact, I have already had YTtalkers offer to pay me if I would review their channel, but I have always turned down their offer and done a review of their channel for free. All I ask is they do it in a public thread (PMing me a link to their review thread when it is finally up) so others might also read it and thus hopefully benefit.
I will if you do one of two things:
1) Prove that you have successful "monster" channels that have followed your no-marketing strategy. Personally, I don't believe you have any successful channel. And by proof I mean tell us your channel titles. Let us go and check out your channel so we can determine for ourselves that they are A) successful and B) followed your no-marketing strategy.
2) Stop saying you have successful channels when giving out advice as proof that your advice works. You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to claim you have a successful channel, use that claim to bolster your advice, and then refuse to provide REAL proof that you have said successful channels. And if you have any decency and agree to do this option, you should then go back into your archive and remove your claims of having a successful channel from them, except where I've called you on it. Where I've called you on it, post a reply that retracts your claim.
You do either of those and I will bury the hatchet.
It doesn't hurt to have high audience retention, but, yes, it is a lousy solo strategy.
Try collaborations. With collaborations, you will get just not more views but more subscribers. When another YouTuber has you on their show or they appear on your show (giving their subscribers a link to see them on your show), those who come to your channel are already YouTube subscribers. That means you've gotten over one of the hurtles for the viewers to subscribe to ANY YouTube channel. Now you're just essentially asking them in the collaboration video to simply add another subscription to those they already have.
Another good thing why collaborations are better than posting to text forums is because collaboration videos show you as a YouTube star. No, I'm not being flippant by calling you then a star. You are at that moment. You're having another YouTuber hold you up to their subscribers as someone they should also subscribe to. In other words, one of the biggest things you get from doing a collaboration is that YouTuber's endorsement of you to their subscribers. Pretty awesome if you think about it.
Another thing that collaboration videos have over text forums is that the videos show viewers you in a video. In other words, they get to see you as YouTuber and not as just a forum typist. The most that most forums give you is an avatar that you can have be your mugshot (see mine here). But a mugshot isn't the same as actual video. Video where people see you move and, most importantly of all, hear you speak.
Yup, the snowball effect is most evident with big channels. However, it does happen on small channels BUT if only 1% of your subscribers share your videos with others (which is a FANTASTIC share rate, by the way) and you only have 90 subscribers, statistically you have essentially a 0% chance that a share will occur. Yes, it is actually merely less than 1% but that's why I said "essentially" since odds are it won't happen.
Pretty much. But there are lots of different way of promoting your channel. One size doesn't not fit all. While, yes, I do have a Word document that I copy and paste for most of my channel reviews, I always go beyond it by first giving poster specific suggestions. I also delete certain suggestions from the standard advice I give out because some suggestions are off the mark for that specific YouTuber. And then there are some YouTubers who have very unique channels that deserve a lot of special advice, such as the one I did for
@chottom (thread title: "General channel review").
Not to mention the press coverage that big channels get. Forbes just did a profile of some of the most financially successful YouTubers. Do a YouTube search for "YouTube's Richest: Behind The Scenes". All the camera flashing you see going on in that video are for the photographs that will appear in the Forbes magazine's article about them. Not that I think any of them will get many subscribers from that different medium but being profiled in that Forbes article will definitely help their celebrity status and interest by still more news media.
This is why I routinely suggest YouTubers here to post fliers around where they live. Yes, those fliers won't bring in millions of views and thousands of subscribers, but if your channel is under 1,000, bringing in a mere 100 would be HUGE for your channel.
Which begs the question why he's not willing to publicly name his channel now. Was the channel you saw really his channel?
Actually, in his last PM to me, he accidentally revealed a major reason why his channel (if it exists at all) is successful which destroys his position.
I don't think he has ever made that distinction. He only advocates a no-marketing position.
I will assume that apology was to XXLRay and not me. Nevertheless, it is at least good to see that you finally understand what you were wrongly defending. I will pretty much leave your other recent posts alone because of this. However...
You somehow quoted XXLRay as saying: "And let us talk about "the point" so there's no confusion between us or by those reading our exchanges. The point you're advocating is that you do not need to do marketing but only focus on making great content to be a success on YouTube." And then said:
First, XXLRay didn't say that. I did.
Second, I was summing up your and YouTuber1978's position. I was doing so so there would be no confusion ... which happened anyway but I at least tried to prevent it with the above statement.