A Warning About George Vanous/Freedom

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this is a very great thread to be honest, now if everything was written like a kid would write (No offence to the younger generation some of you have a vast range of vocabulary and grammar)

But anywho, i find this very very interesting, I always had my doubt about george and till this day I always have said He is an amazing businessman, his business sense is well phenomenal, but there are loop holes. As you said its more than 50,000 its actually 75k now which is absolutely ridiculous, the only other network that has more to that is Awesomeness, and they have 85k (Another network who partners anyone and everyone and 99% are tiny channels) But I completely believe everything you said and always had a feeling theres something hiding between that ever so happy and cheerful face. But like you said his face needs to be everywhere. I agree with all of this but it may be a different story, I always thought he was employing under aged people. (Giving kids a chance to be their own network) they state you need to be 18 but do they actually ask for photo evidence? I think not. As for where they are situated is ridiculous. Whether it may be a tax evading technique I do not know, I have no idea the tax laws in hong kong, but im for certain he would have to pay a s**t load if he was in the US or even more the UK.

Money, Power, and fame? Is this his main motives, I dont know but thats what i seem to believe.

Thanks for this thread cause it may actually change a lot of peoples thoughts about george.
 
It's good to see the responses coming in here. George has the ability to build loyalty incredibly deeply and quickly, so it's not surprising to see some defence, but I'm glad that people are starting to see the full picture.
 
Chris Bellum said:
It's good to see the responses coming in here. George has the ability to build loyalty incredibly deeply and quickly, so it's not surprising to see some defence, but I'm glad that people are starting to see the full picture.
Click to expand...
I saw a comment on the newest Freedom video showing the link to this thread, guess people really are starting to see, and of course some of them are denying it.
 
I've come to the conclusion that there is only one type of channel that benefits from being in Freedom. Channels getting fewer than 10K views per month.

The feature list that Freedom offers is really nothing amazing, outside of a good music library. The biggest benefit that Freedom has though is a 30 day termination period rather than a long contract lock. So, as a small channel not earning money anyways, you can sign on and get a free music library for your videos and really not have to pay anything or commit to a long agreement.

That said, I still have yet to see the actual license agreement for AudioMicro. As such, I have no legal verification that once you leave a network, any videos containing music that were uploaded during the partnership period won't be claimed by AudioMicro. This does mildly concern me as it has the potential to be an underhanded contract lock if all your content has music you can't use outside of a network with a license.

As to the OP, I think the "psychopath" libel was a poor choice, especially when he explained what he meant by psychopath which doesn't match up with the definition of the word at all.[DOUBLEPOST=1410278373,1410278127][/DOUBLEPOST]
Creeper360Bill said:
I saw a comment on the newest Freedom video showing the link to this thread, guess people really are starting to see, and of course some of them are denying it.
Click to expand...

Nothing is changing. Every Freedom thread on this forum is little more than a circlejerk. One one side are people who view George as a snake oil salesman, and on the other side are people who work for George with confirmation bias. Add to that a few kids who don't know any better and the landscape is complete. Nothing is changing because of our discussions here. Freedom is still growing and largely unaffected by it.
 
Tarmack said:
As to the OP, I think the "psychopath" libel was a poor choice, especially when he explained what he meant by psychopath which doesn't match up with the definition of the word at all.[DOUBLEPOST=1410278373,1410278127][/DOUBLEPOST]
Click to expand...

Just to confirm, there's nothing libelous here, I stated that I think/believe that he's a psychopath, which is my opinion. If you look up the definition of 'psychopath' you will see that it refers to someone who demonstrates unstable behaviour. Of course I don't believe he would physically harm someone, but I've definitely seen behaviour that I believe points to mental instability.
 
Chris Bellum said:
Just to confirm, there's nothing libelous here, I stated that I think/believe that he's a psychopath, which is my opinion. If you look up the definition of 'psychopath' you will see that it refers to someone who demonstrates unstable behaviour. Of course I don't believe he would physically harm someone, but I've definitely seen behaviour that I believe points to mental instability.
Click to expand...

b******t. The key tenet of psychopathy relates to an individuals empathic response and has nothing to do with unpredictability or instability. Your misunderstood choice of that extremely reactionary term was not for educational or informative purposes but rather to deliberately degrade the character without any evidence of your stance to back it up. That is the distinction where libel enters the mix. Don't play word games with me, just fix your post and stick to the facts if you want to be taken seriously. I agree with many of your Freedom and George related comments, but that word choice was garbage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top