SomeGuyDude
Just some guy, dude.
I feel like there's this bubble that's about to burst with YouTube.
People have gotten comfortable with YT essentially being "free television". They expect people to spend their lives making awesome videos for us to watch but not to have to do anything to help support them, not even watch ads for a few seconds. I know tons of people who barely watch TV any more in favor of their preferred channels. I'm one of them, honestly. I have YT going on in the background more than anything else.
Yet throughout it all, everyone has such a "give me everything I want right now and no I don't want to pay for it." Making a good YouTube channel is not free. It takes time, capital, and resources not only from the content creators but from the site that hosts them. So far all YouTube has done is ask that you watch a few ads now and again. Now there's the OPTION to pay a few bucks a month to support an absolutely ENORMOUS operation that has provided people with years of content and everyone is bent out of shape.
That doesn't explain why you'd use AdBlock. Ads are free. They ask nothing for you other than your time. Unless you're sprinting frantically home with exactly 10 minutes to watch one YouTube video in between your two jobs and can't spare ten seconds, there's no excuse.
Actually, scrap that. There's no excuse at all. There is no such thing as a human being whose time is so limited that the paltry few ads you get on YouTube makes it prohibitive. You're acting entitled and selfish. Turn that off, man. Let the ads run, the channels you love RELY upon those ads.
I remember seeing some numbers a big channel ran and it was AWFUL how many viewers use adblock. Like, it is SO DIFFICULT to make it as a YouTuber not just because of how hard it is to get big, but because of how many viewers block the ads. And that's it. A few little ads. But no, that's too much.
What you're saying is "I want you to spend weeks making videos for me, but I don't want to spend 15 seconds on an ad before I watch it in order to help you make a living."
It's unbelievable.[DOUBLEPOST=1424458969,1424458801][/DOUBLEPOST]
I admit I run adblock, but ANY site I like? I turn it off for that. My whitelist is pretty long. I keep it on hand just so I can check out links I get sent without my screen exploding with ads everywhere. It's a spam filter, not an inconvenience filter.[DOUBLEPOST=1424459243][/DOUBLEPOST]
I believe anyone CAN block adblockers in the sense of if they realize you're running one they can totally change the content.
I would not at ALL be surprised if, eventually, YouTube converts to a Spotify-style existence where there's a free version, but it has ads and you're limited to 480p videos. If you want HD and no ads you'll have to pay.
I'd also wager that in the new model, it would actually be BETTER for content creators because then they could be paid by traffic in the way that Spotify pays artists per song streamed. But that's just me spitballing.
People have gotten comfortable with YT essentially being "free television". They expect people to spend their lives making awesome videos for us to watch but not to have to do anything to help support them, not even watch ads for a few seconds. I know tons of people who barely watch TV any more in favor of their preferred channels. I'm one of them, honestly. I have YT going on in the background more than anything else.
Yet throughout it all, everyone has such a "give me everything I want right now and no I don't want to pay for it." Making a good YouTube channel is not free. It takes time, capital, and resources not only from the content creators but from the site that hosts them. So far all YouTube has done is ask that you watch a few ads now and again. Now there's the OPTION to pay a few bucks a month to support an absolutely ENORMOUS operation that has provided people with years of content and everyone is bent out of shape.
When you're on an extremely limited monthly budget (Under 1K USD) and living in one of the most expensive regions in the US, I don't have time to do subscription stuff on something as paltry as a video website. I need that money for bills, rent and food, not Youtube.
That doesn't explain why you'd use AdBlock. Ads are free. They ask nothing for you other than your time. Unless you're sprinting frantically home with exactly 10 minutes to watch one YouTube video in between your two jobs and can't spare ten seconds, there's no excuse.
Actually, scrap that. There's no excuse at all. There is no such thing as a human being whose time is so limited that the paltry few ads you get on YouTube makes it prohibitive. You're acting entitled and selfish. Turn that off, man. Let the ads run, the channels you love RELY upon those ads.
I remember seeing some numbers a big channel ran and it was AWFUL how many viewers use adblock. Like, it is SO DIFFICULT to make it as a YouTuber not just because of how hard it is to get big, but because of how many viewers block the ads. And that's it. A few little ads. But no, that's too much.
What you're saying is "I want you to spend weeks making videos for me, but I don't want to spend 15 seconds on an ad before I watch it in order to help you make a living."
It's unbelievable.[DOUBLEPOST=1424458969,1424458801][/DOUBLEPOST]
Completely agree, man.
Don't they know YTTalk runs on ads as well?
I admit I run adblock, but ANY site I like? I turn it off for that. My whitelist is pretty long. I keep it on hand just so I can check out links I get sent without my screen exploding with ads everywhere. It's a spam filter, not an inconvenience filter.[DOUBLEPOST=1424459243][/DOUBLEPOST]
I have a feeling YouTube/google can block the adblockers anytime they want. I've thought that for a long time. I might be wrong but it's a feeling I had. Some will pay, some won't. We'll just have to see how everything shakes out.
I believe anyone CAN block adblockers in the sense of if they realize you're running one they can totally change the content.
I would not at ALL be surprised if, eventually, YouTube converts to a Spotify-style existence where there's a free version, but it has ads and you're limited to 480p videos. If you want HD and no ads you'll have to pay.
I'd also wager that in the new model, it would actually be BETTER for content creators because then they could be paid by traffic in the way that Spotify pays artists per song streamed. But that's just me spitballing.
