Thanks. Okay so basically it only effects the policy not what you can actually claim? I'd assume since the option appears on the video that it would check vid 1 vs vid 2 to see if it's the same. Is the audio they're refering to audio that's provided by the MCN?
It's only for my music which is released, I still would like to use this feature on the majority of my uploads which are tutorial videos about music production.
Because I was under the assumption that someone could put a content ID claim on gameplay/visual footage that looked the same, i.e. a cutscene from ACIV, there's thousands of videos that would have the same cutscene and giving someone the power to put a content ID claim on it would target all those videos. Like I mentioned in an earlier post, some gameplay elements can look the same, especially in the more linear/scripted games, regardless of who is playing. Obviously for games like GTA or ACIV the gameplay varies a little. Everyone also knows Ubisoft doesn't object to using cutscenes in LPs so most people leave them in. But Shane seems to be providing the right information. By the looks of it the user has no control over major elements that can be claimed.
Ahh, I see. If being under a MCN is one of the sole requirements, then I guess you would have to partner your channel with a MCN network? It seems unfair since it forces users to partner if they want control over what happens to any matched content the system finds.It's only for my music which is released, I still would like to use this feature on the majority of my uploads which are tutorial videos about music production.
Yeah but let's assume that you could content ID video footage, than still there won't be a problem for gamers. The company who makes and releases owns the copyright on the visuals, so when anybody would claim a video with gameplay footage that won't do a thing, since the uploader is not the copyright holder for those visuals. So that will most likely result in a false Content ID claim for the channel who claimed the footage.
I will never partner with a network as long as the networks behave the way they do at the moment, it's all about making money as much and fast as possible of the hard work of us content creators...Ahh, I see. If being under a MCN is one of the sole requirements, then I guess you would have to partner your channel with a MCN network? It seems unfair since it forces users to partner if they want control over what happens to any matched content the system finds.
Yeah but this would have meant; not only would we have had to worry about the dodgy 3rd party companies, but then other content creators doing it as well. And this would have increased the content ID claims being made, I don't want to sit their going through videos disputing claims which can also take a while to get the dispute through. Keeping in mind that LPs of a particular game can range anywhere between 50-100 videos, especially for AAA titles. I didn't want content ID claims regardless of false or not, so that was another issue. Fortunately 1 we don't have to worry about by the looks of it xD. I've already had problems where I've had claims from a 3rd party company at the sametime as WB (who I really don't want to mess with at all) and it didn't give me the option to dispute the false claim only both claims since they were at the same point, it was an odd situation that resulted in me having to cancel the entire playthrough and the review (which I didn't start thankfully). I might try again for that soon though. But it would be really nice if they did allow a content ID system that checked the entire video against another to check for reuploads. But they would have to apply this to every channel not just networked 1s.
