TigerXtrm
I Love YTtalk
The main thing is we might own the game, but we don't own the liscense, the characters, the logo, etc. that's what happened when Capcom released sf x Tekken with on disc Dlc that hackers found. The main argument was that yes you own the disk but not the liscense.
I really hate to say this since it makes me look like a hypocritical since I do a game review where obviously the main draw are the games we review... But we don't own the games and are basically making money off someone else's work. Like that one guy that makes money off of others viral videos and just adding his commentary to it.
That's why the Nintendo claim thing doesn't p**s me off. Might suck for you guys but they have every right to do it. It's THEIR property not ours.
I fully agree with you, but you have one thing backwards. We don't actually own the game, the game developer owns the game. When you buy a game in the store you buy a limited license to USE the game.
It's a delicate balance between YouTubers and developers. What I was pointing out earlier was basically that the law can prohibit people from making money on game footage. But it can never be completely prohibited to record and upload game footage.
But yes, I agree. Developers and YouTubers are in a sort of unspoken mutual understanding where both parties benefit. The developer gets free exposure for their game and in return they allow us to make a buck or two for our troubles. They don't HAVE to do that and so I won't be mad one moment when a developer decides to claim the videos for themselves. I would get mad if they demand the video is taken down though. That is not their right and not their business.