is it worth it?

Chase Butler said:
Yeah but I think unless they say you can reupload them, then I think it's still illegal. And I know other channels do it, but that doesn't make it legal.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Ill make sure that they will let me use their song :D[DOUBLEPOST=1366060334,1366060299][/DOUBLEPOST]
FlipRJ said:
if it's an original song by the artist, as long as you have their consent, you can do it. since they don't copyright it, all intellectual properties are the creators, thus it's their decision. So I'm pretty sure you can do it, but you might want to get a few more opinions.
Click to expand...
Yeah ill make a poll :p
 
Ok tiny pet peeve of mine. There is no such thing as "no copyright music" ... all music (and other creative works) are automatically copyrighted by law. Sure you can do a fancy copyright claim through the US Copyright and Trademarks office, but legally don't really need to until such time you wanted to defend your copyright in court (even then as long as you have solid evidence you created the work and can prove on which date you created it, you can defend your copyright).

For artists, like Kevin MacLeod, who legally allow people to use his music for commercial purposes ... that music is still his by copyright. What he's done is provide the music royalty-free, which means he does not require any royalty payments and/or license fees for people to use his creative works.

Sorry, just bugs me when I see people throw around the term "no copyright" or "non-copyright" all the time.

Source: A friend of mine is a copyright, trademark and patent lawyer.
 
Kleineganz said:
Ok tiny pet peeve of mine. There is no such thing as "no copyright music" ... all music (and other creative works) are automatically copyrighted by law. Sure you can do a fancy copyright claim through the US Copyright and Trademarks office, but legally don't really need to until such time you wanted to defend your copyright in court (even then as long as you have solid evidence you created the work and can prove on which date you created it, you can defend your copyright).

For artists, like Kevin MacLeod, who legally allow people to use his music for commercial purposes ... that music is still his by copyright. What he's done is provide the music royalty-free, which means he does not require any royalty payments and/or license fees for people to use his creative works.

Sorry, just bugs me when I see people throw around the term "no copyright" or "non-copyright" all the time.

Source: A friend of mine is a copyright, trademark and patent lawyer.
Click to expand...
Ohhh okay, I must have sounded like a retard then :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top