Got a copyright strike

EDIT: Sorry, Conso1727, I meant to quote someone else.

PositivelyBrainwashed said:
Can anyone explain the difference? Just curious what's a content ID claim.
Click to expand...

What GrgakGames posted was a Content-ID claim where they just put ads on his video. He is disputing it.

Here is an example of a Content-ID claim where they not only put ads on it, they also block it in some countries (Germany in this case) and on mobile phones, tablets, TVs, and game consoles (so 90% of my views):
cr1.png

Here's an example of a Content-ID claim where they have blocked it worldwide. Only my account can view it. It is the same as it being marked private.
cr2.png

Here's an example of a Content-ID claim that I disputed and they reinstated the claim. Normally you can click on the text "appeal rejected dispute" but my account is in bad standing, so I can't appeal right now:
cr3.png

Here's an example of a Content-ID claim where I appealed the rejected dispute and I'm waiting for them to respond:
cr4.png

Here's an example of a Content-ID claim where they responded negatively to the appeal. The video will be taken down 7 days after their response and I'll get a copyright strike if I don't cancel the appeal. If I cancel it, it goes back to the Content-ID status (blocked worldwide in this case) and I can never appeal it again. If they had responded positively, the claim would've been released:
cr5.png

Here's an example of a Copyright Strike. It makes it so I can't have "unlisted" videos, I can't appeal rejected disputes, can't share ad revenue with "cover" Content-ID claims, and various other things that don't affect me. In this case, I have already sent the counter-notification:
cr6.png
 
Last edited:
Shakycow said:
Why do you feel that would fall under fair use?
Click to expand...

"Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work."

Comes straight from Youtubes fair use url

am I wrong? or.
 
GrgakGames said:
"Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions.
Click to expand...

More likely doesn't mean it is fair use...only that, if you were following the criteria for fair use, you're more likely to be granted fair use if it was a shorter over longer segment.

That doesn't change that there are still rules and requirements for using fair use that your video fails to meet.
 
Shakycow said:
More likely doesn't mean it is fair use...only that, if you were following the criteria for fair use, you're more likely to be granted fair use if it was a shorter over longer segment.

That doesn't change that there are still rules and requirements for using fair use that your video fails to meet.
Click to expand...

What is not fair use then?
 
GrgakGames said:
What is not fair use then?
Click to expand...

Do you have or have you attempted to receive permission to use the copyrighted (and likely trademarked) work in your own? Were you critiquing it in any way? Did you modify it or make it unique? Were you using it for educational reasons or offering a critique of it?

Do yourself a favor and research the 4 factors of fair use... and know that YouTube often plays more to the side of caution rather than the gray areas.

Simply put, if you use footage or music that you didn't create or have the proper rights to use, don't be surprised if you get a 3rd party claim or copyright strike.
 
Shakycow said:
Do you have or have you attempted to receive permission to use the copyrighted (and likely trademarked) work in your own? Were you critiquing it in any way? Did you modify it or make it unique? Were you using it for educational reasons or offering a critique of it?

Do yourself a favor and research the 4 factors of fair use... and know that YouTube often plays more to the side of caution rather than the gray areas.

Simply put, if you use footage or music that you didn't create or have the proper rights to use, don't be surprised if you get a 3rd party claim or copyright strike.
Click to expand...

That's all well and good and finally you actually gave some sort of answer.

albeit a bit sassy.


Just watched it.

Still think my video falls under fair use.
 
Shakycow said:
Do you have or have you attempted to receive permission to use the copyrighted (and likely trademarked) work in your own? Were you critiquing it in any way? Did you modify it or make it unique? Were you using it for educational reasons or offering a critique of it?

Do yourself a favor and research the 4 factors of fair use... and know that YouTube often plays more to the side of caution rather than the gray areas.

Simply put, if you use footage or music that you didn't create or have the proper rights to use, don't be surprised if you get a 3rd party claim or copyright strike.
Click to expand...

also just to let you know I was right and I won the claim.

so I mean

upload_2016-4-18_5-22-31.png
 
GrgakGames said:
also just to let you know I was right and I won the claim.

so I mean
Click to expand...

More than likely, that's because for them to counter again would mean they would have to take you to court which isn't worth the time or effort.

It does not mean that you were within fair use.
 
Shakycow said:
More than likely, that's because for them to counter again would mean they would have to take you to court which isn't worth the time or effort.

It does not mean that you were within fair use.
Click to expand...
Negative Nancy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top