Freedom Misleading Subnetworks?

The bottom line is if you are trying to make money on YouTube do not join Freedom unless you feel you need their help and you also must be at least a medium size channel.
 
Shane.C said:
Sort of off-topic but I just saw this and yea.... :D One of those videos were I can't help but look but am cringing the whole way through.


Certainly original though. :thumbsup2: George
Click to expand...
Twerk and be freeeeee! That was hilarious :D I really wouldn't have expected that for Audiomicro coming soon.
 
Unless he's marketing them as networks then I don't see anything misleading here. It just seems more like a principle thing, like his personal feelings towards what a sub network should be called. But that being said, he'd sound like an idiot either way, saying a sub network shouldn't be referred to as such is like saying subsidiaries shouldn't be referred to as such. They are technical terms/words used when referring to these types of businesses. He may even be getting the definitions wrong cause he did say that size shouldn't effect whether they're called a sub network or not when a sub network pretty much just means a network under a parent network or at least how most people refer to them, has nothing to do with size. I think I've even seen sub networks with more subscribers and influence than it's parent network at times.
 
Shane.C said:
Sort of off-topic but I just saw this and yea.... :D One of those videos were I can't help but look but am cringing the whole way through.



Certainly original though. :thumbsup2: George
Click to expand...

You're forgetting about the email they sent their partners about Twitch buying YouTube. Yes, in that order. :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top