Majorlemon
New Member
Someone told me that critique, commentary and educative content wasn't fair use when it comes to using copyrighted pictures.
I'm really surprised because of the countless youtube channels that monetize things like fashion show reviews including dozens of pictures they didn't take in each video, channels like The Art Assignment that include paintings, or people that include movie stills in their review videos. I know most of those people live off this activity and some of them are small channels with little means, so there is no way they get licencing for everything. That would be an extremely long and costly process. Yet, this is a whole industry. So basically they are in illegal territory?
I get a lot of "I think it's fair but I'm not sure". So I have to keep on searching and I haven't come to a clear answer after 2 days. I'm trying to get this answer directly from people that made this type of content for a while, still got no response.
I'm really surprised because of the countless youtube channels that monetize things like fashion show reviews including dozens of pictures they didn't take in each video, channels like The Art Assignment that include paintings, or people that include movie stills in their review videos. I know most of those people live off this activity and some of them are small channels with little means, so there is no way they get licencing for everything. That would be an extremely long and costly process. Yet, this is a whole industry. So basically they are in illegal territory?
I get a lot of "I think it's fair but I'm not sure". So I have to keep on searching and I haven't come to a clear answer after 2 days. I'm trying to get this answer directly from people that made this type of content for a while, still got no response.