mrtjrages
Well-Known Member
I guess first and foremost: Please move this to the correct forum if this thread isn't a true definition of gossip lol...and I guess if a topic like this already exists, then please direct me to it?
And second, I hope the title was catchy enough :]
Disclaimer: Think of this as a dream, and don't take this too seriously or there is a possibility some salty vibes may occur Also, I'm asking these questions just to get a better understanding of YouTube farther down to its core. Also, I'm not looking to start any wars nor "challenging" anyone.
 Also, I'm asking these questions just to get a better understanding of YouTube farther down to its core. Also, I'm not looking to start any wars nor "challenging" anyone.
I won't keep you guys long, I promise. I just want to know your thoughts on something...: Say we lived in an alternate universe where YouTube decided to actually help promote seemingly consistent YouTubers (mostly aiming at smaller YouTubers). It's very difficult to even find any of your videos in the search results because of users with a bigger audience!
Now I know YouTubers get paid by video views(?) not the number of subscribers, right? And the more people watch videos = more money because of advertisements. And I'm sure a hefty chunk goes to YouTube, correct?
I know I'm all over the place at this point, but lets leave big YouTubers out of this equation--they are unaffected by this alternate universe. They still have their subs and view count depending on the video...
I guess what I'm getting at is....Isn't it more beneficial (financially) for YouTube to cash in on "everyone's talent/content" instead of a select few?
-I do want to state that I'm no business expert...
But I think of it like this - Example: You hire 10 people to work for you. I always assumed that it'd be more profitable in the long run to take a dollar from each of the 10 people than to take 2 dollars from 3 people?
In closing:
-Would everyone having subs (lets say 100k each--honestly I just threw out a random number) be bad for Youtube?
-If so, what problems would this present?
-If everyone did have 100k subs, (and you're getting consistent traffic and (more) views DUE to the people subscribed to you) Does that mean more ad revenue towards YouTube?
-Please add on to the discussion because I'm sure I definitely left out plenty of thought.
-Also, I'm TJ. Nice to meet you :]
[/enddream]
				
			And second, I hope the title was catchy enough :]
Disclaimer: Think of this as a dream, and don't take this too seriously or there is a possibility some salty vibes may occur
 Also, I'm asking these questions just to get a better understanding of YouTube farther down to its core. Also, I'm not looking to start any wars nor "challenging" anyone.
 Also, I'm asking these questions just to get a better understanding of YouTube farther down to its core. Also, I'm not looking to start any wars nor "challenging" anyone.I won't keep you guys long, I promise. I just want to know your thoughts on something...: Say we lived in an alternate universe where YouTube decided to actually help promote seemingly consistent YouTubers (mostly aiming at smaller YouTubers). It's very difficult to even find any of your videos in the search results because of users with a bigger audience!
Now I know YouTubers get paid by video views(?) not the number of subscribers, right? And the more people watch videos = more money because of advertisements. And I'm sure a hefty chunk goes to YouTube, correct?
I know I'm all over the place at this point, but lets leave big YouTubers out of this equation--they are unaffected by this alternate universe. They still have their subs and view count depending on the video...
I guess what I'm getting at is....Isn't it more beneficial (financially) for YouTube to cash in on "everyone's talent/content" instead of a select few?
-I do want to state that I'm no business expert...
But I think of it like this - Example: You hire 10 people to work for you. I always assumed that it'd be more profitable in the long run to take a dollar from each of the 10 people than to take 2 dollars from 3 people?
In closing:
-Would everyone having subs (lets say 100k each--honestly I just threw out a random number) be bad for Youtube?
-If so, what problems would this present?
-If everyone did have 100k subs, (and you're getting consistent traffic and (more) views DUE to the people subscribed to you) Does that mean more ad revenue towards YouTube?
-Please add on to the discussion because I'm sure I definitely left out plenty of thought.
-Also, I'm TJ. Nice to meet you :]
[/enddream]
 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		