Don't guess.
OP, here's the thing you need to consider. Reviews by their own nature are a fair use applicable project. The whole point of fair use in relation to reviews is to protect the reviewer and prevent the company from getting in the way of reviews or influencing them by way of abusing copyright law. So, it stands to reason that in order to review a product, you need to show the product you are talking about.
However...
If you have to use Apple videos in order to show the product because you don't have it, how is your content a review? I think that would be the biggest stumbling block. I get that smaller channels have a tough time getting products to compare, but in order to be a review channel, you kinda have to actually review stuff. A compare and contrast feature list video isn't really a review.
Monetization of the content is essentially irrelevant for this particular purpose. If you are protected by fair use under review, monetization is permitted.