Creative nation run by 16 year old thieves

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you earned $3000, received a copyright strike, but your channel was still alive they are liable to pay your money. On the other hand, if your channel was terminated before payday then they can show you proof that it got reclaimed and you're all good. Most likely they won't show you proof, but good luck. It seems like this wouldn't be a thread if Creative Nation would actually show proof to Smexeh.
 
Man i know you trying to help but your missing the point...

shane is claiming that he never received my revunue

but i know he has

he is not giving evidence that the revenue was reclaimed.
 
Smexeh said:
The money DOES belong to me and he is being immature by keeping the cash to himself.

Even if the cash doenst belong to me (but it does) , then why should shane keep it?
Click to expand...

Smexeh said:
The money DOES belong to me and he is being immature by keeping the cash to himself.

Even if the cash doenst belong to me (but it does) , then why should shane keep it?[DOUBLEPOST=1392647337,1392647298][/DOUBLEPOST]all i want is proof of the reclaim and they fail to provide[DOUBLEPOST=1392647390][/DOUBLEPOST]
thats the point.... google HAS NOT reclaimed anything.

no point backing him up. we all know he grabbed at the opportunity to make a quick $3000.
Click to expand...

Please explain how it does belong to you as I would like to understand your thinking behind this. If the videos are owned by someone else then they're not yours to profit from.

How do you know that Google has not reclaimed anything?
 
jamesbond said:
If you earned $3000, received a copyright strike, but your channel was still alive they are liable to pay your money. On the other hand, if your channel was terminated before payday then they can show you proof that it got reclaimed and you're all good. Most likely they won't show you proof, but good luck. It seems like this wouldn't be a thread if Creative Nation would actually show proof to Smexeh.
Click to expand...
yeah thats the point. they are 16 year old cowards behind a computer screen. too much of a coward to show me proof.[DOUBLEPOST=1392647717,1392647626][/DOUBLEPOST]
Michael said:
Please explain how it does belong to you as I would like to understand your thinking behind this. If the videos are owned by someone else then they're not yours to profit from.

How do you know that Google has not reclaimed anything?
Click to expand...
firstly i would of got some sort of email of google reclaiming

secondly i have never heard of reclaiming before

lastly, i have had several other channels that received a strike, and i got my money . ALL my money.

it seems to me creative nation have stole my money. hence the reason why they are not giving proof.

ive asked many different network owners they all told me it sounds fishy and google dont reclaim for copyrights.
 
How do you know that Google has not reclaimed anything?
Click to expand...

I have never seen any threads on here about "Google reclaiming money" with networks. On top of that they don't show proof and why they don't is simple, they don't have any. This is part of their business strategy. They find people who are breaking the rules that YouTube hasn't noticed, and keep their money.
 
Smexeh said:
yeah thats the point. they are 16 year old cowards behind a computer screen. too much of a coward to show me proof.[DOUBLEPOST=1392647717,1392647626][/DOUBLEPOST]
firstly i would of got some sort of email of google reclaiming

secondly i have never heard of reclaiming before

lastly, i have had several other channels that received a strike, and i got my money . ALL my money.

it seems to me creative nation have stole my money. hence the reason why they are not giving proof.

ive asked many different network owners they all told me it sounds fishy and google dont reclaim for copyrights.
Click to expand...

This was almost painful to read.
 
jamesbond said:
I have never seen any threads on here about "Google reclaiming money" with networks. On top of that they don't show proof and why they don't is simple, they don't have any. This is part of their business strategy. They find people who are breaking the rules that YouTube hasn't noticed, and keep their money.
Click to expand...
you said it perfectly...

its still not right though, is it? :/ :([DOUBLEPOST=1392648325,1392648138][/DOUBLEPOST]its funny how ive only had this problem when the network is run by 16 year olds as well as it being a new network.[DOUBLEPOST=1392648359][/DOUBLEPOST]
Kamran Sankey said:
This was almost painful to read.
Click to expand...
whatever mate, backing up your irish friend. i like it.[DOUBLEPOST=1392648450][/DOUBLEPOST]
MegaBoringGuy said:
Why don't both of you show proof so there's actually something to go by instead of tough internet talk?
Click to expand...
Yeah... i doubt he would give proof. he told the coo gabriel i would be getting a quaterly google report showing the reclaim

i bet he lied to him as well to shut me up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top