but also consider on the internet, youtube has managed to act above the law. They allowed the orchard to tag obama's speech in chicago - thats illegal in the most symbolic way. Is youtube the front of illegal activity ? is youtube the accomplice in this crime ? or is youtube simply making money by being above the law and staying out of such disputes ? either way, they've taken a torrent approach and let the server and user handle it themselves. a torrent doesn't make decisions for server or user, it just connects them.
it's very "here's the cid gun, knock yourselves out" - btw, my cost for using this connection is ad money...thanks. Quite a federal approach if you think about it. The federal bank is privately owned, yet deeply integrated into our government. this is a blatant conflict of interest, yet not illegal and in a sense above the law.