Battlefield Vs COD

I have to agree with Br00talOfficial, both have alot of DLC packs and for me that's a huge disapointment and battlefield 4 just looks like bf3 so I don't see a really good progress
and for CoD I just think it's meh, so both suck.
 
I tried to get into the COD series, but since BF Vietnam, I've always been been a fan of that series. Vehicles are the bomb... literally.
 
I like them both but I play MW3 for the most of the time and MW4 is going to be released soon, is what I've heared and then it will be cool to play the new COD & BF series :D
 
FNGSmexxy said:
I started off my fps gaming scene playing battlefield 3 one of the first games i got on ps3 if not the first just can't remember. Then eventually got MW3 for making youtube videos saw gets you alot of views. Ended up playing more COD first when i got MW3 played it 5 min sold it then re bought it dont know why dont ask. So now in my fps journey I see myself really just disliking COD and going back to Battlefield thats why I think BF series is better than COD.

What do you guys think
Click to expand...
i like conquest in battlefield,but jets pilots,the good ones ruin the game,you can't even exit the base if enemy got a good jet pilot
 
William Phan said:
I tried to get into the COD series, but since BF Vietnam, I've always been been a fan of that series. Vehicles are the bomb... literally.
Click to expand...
yeah and its just way more relaxing and fun[DOUBLEPOST=1368304319,1368304284][/DOUBLEPOST]
Andrea said:
i like conquest in battlefield,but jets pilots,the good ones ruin the game,you can't even exit the base if enemy got a good jet pilot
Click to expand...
yeah getting spawned trapped isnt fun
 
Honestly that is the wrong question, what you are really asking is console vs Gaming PC, and if you have a console than BF3 suck on it so you play cod, but if you have a good PC and are able to run bf3 on ultra with 90+FPS than its a no brainer, BF3 FTW
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top