Why are people clicking away at the start of my videos?

Acerthorn

Loving YTtalk
I'll attach fifty screenshots to this post. These are the absolute audience retention rates (as of the time of this writing) for the last 50 public videos on my channel that have them. You can see the videos they correspond to by going to the channel of youtube.com/acerthorn, clicking on the "videos" tab, and - with the videos sorted by newest to oldest - view the videos starting with "When Gamer Entitlement Really Does Become a Problem" (the most recent video for which audience retention analytics are available) and ending with "Let's Play Fallout: New Vegas Blind #01 - Ack the Amnesiac," while skipping over the announcement videos such as "Let's Plays are Going Part Time," "Harry Potter Retrospective - the Introduction" and "Acerthorn's Patreon Page." I didn't look at their analytics because they weren't designed to get views, per se, but just to keep my audience abreast of what's going on.

Now, some of these audience retention analytics are more jagged than others. Some go up and down like a roller coaster. Others, after the first few minutes, tend to be relatively slow but steady declines. However, there is one common element among all of them: The very start of the videos usually see a dramatic drop in viewer retention.

Some of my videos are more than an hour long, so maybe some people are intimidated away by the video's length. But then, why are the other videos that aren't that long having the same problem? A commonly-cited reason for videos that have this problem is that the intros are too long. Some of my videos have intro sequences ... no more than ten seconds long ... but there are just as many other videos in this list of 50 that don't have any intro sequence. I instead just get right to the point. And yet, I still get the same huge drop in retention at the outset.

Can somebody please take a look at my videos and find a common element that might actually be causing this problem? Something that each of these videos actually have in common (not just something that's a problem with some videos but not all) which would explain why they all have the same audience retention problem.
 

Attachments

  • #01 (Top 5 TES Easter Eggs).png
    #01 (Top 5 TES Easter Eggs).png
    52.2 KB · Views: 7
  • #02 (Witcher 3 Part 1).png
    #02 (Witcher 3 Part 1).png
    48.3 KB · Views: 3
  • #03 (Why Fallout 4 Didn't Fail).png
    #03 (Why Fallout 4 Didn't Fail).png
    62.3 KB · Views: 2
  • #04 (Star Shift).PNG
    #04 (Star Shift).PNG
    64.8 KB · Views: 1
  • #05 (Super Mario RPG vs Paper Mario).PNG
    #05 (Super Mario RPG vs Paper Mario).PNG
    61.6 KB · Views: 1
  • #06 (Olfina makes no sense).PNG
    #06 (Olfina makes no sense).PNG
    68.6 KB · Views: 1
  • #07 (Sims 4 Part 1).PNG
    #07 (Sims 4 Part 1).PNG
    28.3 KB · Views: 1
  • #08 (HP Retrospective 1-01).PNG
    #08 (HP Retrospective 1-01).PNG
    75.3 KB · Views: 1
  • #09 (HP Retrospective 1-02).PNG
    #09 (HP Retrospective 1-02).PNG
    75.3 KB · Views: 1
  • #10 (Bethesda E3 2019).PNG
    #10 (Bethesda E3 2019).PNG
    74.4 KB · Views: 0
  • #11 (FO76 Unique Storytelling).PNG
    #11 (FO76 Unique Storytelling).PNG
    72 KB · Views: 0
  • #12 (HP Retrospective 1-03).PNG
    #12 (HP Retrospective 1-03).PNG
    68.8 KB · Views: 0
  • #13 (Oblivion Crisis Makes No Sense).PNG
    #13 (Oblivion Crisis Makes No Sense).PNG
    5.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #14 (Should Duncan have killed Jory).PNG
    #14 (Should Duncan have killed Jory).PNG
    5.6 KB · Views: 0
  • #15 (Wind Waker Sucks).PNG
    #15 (Wind Waker Sucks).PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #16 (Reading Mean Comments).PNG
    #16 (Reading Mean Comments).PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #17 (Mario vs DK Part 1).PNG
    #17 (Mario vs DK Part 1).PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 0
  • #18 (Mages Guild Quiz).PNG
    #18 (Mages Guild Quiz).PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 1
  • #19 Bethesda isn't EA).PNG
    #19 Bethesda isn't EA).PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #20 (In Defense of 2K).PNG
    #20 (In Defense of 2K).PNG
    5.5 KB · Views: 0
  • #21 (Paper Mario TTYD Part 1).PNG
    #21 (Paper Mario TTYD Part 1).PNG
    6 KB · Views: 0
  • #22 (FO4 is WoZ).PNG
    #22 (FO4 is WoZ).PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #23 (Soule Accused).PNG
    #23 (Soule Accused).PNG
    5.5 KB · Views: 0
  • #24 (MTX are not optional).PNG
    #24 (MTX are not optional).PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 0
  • #25 (How to Stop MTX).PNG
    #25 (How to Stop MTX).PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 1
  • #26 (Kingdom Hearts Part 1).PNG
    #26 (Kingdom Hearts Part 1).PNG
    6.4 KB · Views: 0
  • #27 (Why AAA Game Companies are so Greedy).PNG
    #27 (Why AAA Game Companies are so Greedy).PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 0
  • #28 (How I doubled my CTR).PNG
    #28 (How I doubled my CTR).PNG
    6.1 KB · Views: 0
  • #29 (Bethesda Isn't EA Part 2).PNG
    #29 (Bethesda Isn't EA Part 2).PNG
    5.2 KB · Views: 0
  • #30 (Loot Box vs Game Show).PNG
    #30 (Loot Box vs Game Show).PNG
    6 KB · Views: 0
  • #31 (MTX regulation).PNG
    #31 (MTX regulation).PNG
    6.1 KB · Views: 0
  • #32 (Fallout NV Retrospective).PNG
    #32 (Fallout NV Retrospective).PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 0
  • #33 (Kerry Hopkins tells the truth).PNG
    #33 (Kerry Hopkins tells the truth).PNG
    6.1 KB · Views: 1
  • #34 (Oblivion DLC Canon).PNG
    #34 (Oblivion DLC Canon).PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 0
  • #35 (WWE 2k20 Part 1).PNG
    #35 (WWE 2k20 Part 1).PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #36 (Bethesda Game Engine).PNG
    #36 (Bethesda Game Engine).PNG
    5.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #37 (WWE 2k20 False Advertising).PNG
    #37 (WWE 2k20 False Advertising).PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 0
  • #38 (WWE 2k20 Same Kids).PNG
    #38 (WWE 2k20 Same Kids).PNG
    6.4 KB · Views: 0
  • #39 (COPPA Explained).PNG
    #39 (COPPA Explained).PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 0
  • #40 (COPPA Part 2).PNG
    #40 (COPPA Part 2).PNG
    5.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #41 (HP Retrospective 1-05).PNG
    #41 (HP Retrospective 1-05).PNG
    5.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #42 (Oblivion TG Makes No Sense).PNG
    #42 (Oblivion TG Makes No Sense).PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 0
  • #43 (HP Retrospective 1-06).PNG
    #43 (HP Retrospective 1-06).PNG
    6.4 KB · Views: 0
  • #44 (Gamer Entitlement).PNG
    #44 (Gamer Entitlement).PNG
    6.2 KB · Views: 0
  • #45 (DB Lore Quiz).PNG
    #45 (DB Lore Quiz).PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 0
  • #46 (FO4 Retrospective).PNG
    #46 (FO4 Retrospective).PNG
    5.6 KB · Views: 0
  • #47 (Forsworn).PNG
    #47 (Forsworn).PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #48.PNG
    #48.PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 0
  • #49 (Balgruuf).PNG
    #49 (Balgruuf).PNG
    6.1 KB · Views: 0
  • #50 (New Vegas Part 1).PNG
    #50 (New Vegas Part 1).PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 0
Hi Acerthorn! Just checked out a couple of your videos and one thing that I've seen is that you jump straight into your video. Keep in mind that it's those first ten seconds that are the make it or break it moment for many viewers. In your TES and FO videos your intro consists cinematic footage from trailers or other game cinematic. Know your audience. People who are interested in lore videos, easter eggs, retrospectives or other detailed looks into games are probably already big fans and have seen these same exact clips several times. Try having a prelude to your intro with commentary relating to your video or a clip from later in the video - not some Ali-a over dramatic reaction, but just something to grab the viewers attention.

Good luck!
 
You don't get it, do you? It happens to ALL my videos! You only described one category of my videos. But if that really were the source of the problem, why isn't the problem exclusive to my TES and FO videos?
 
You don't get it, do you?

Guess I don’t, sorry.

I'll take a step back, glance at a couple more of your videos and rethink my reply.

Here we go:

People who don't know your channel, content, and personality don't want to risk wasting 25 - 90 minutes of their life of their life on what might be not be entertaining content to them, they just don't know.

Since these people have already clicked on your video, this isn't a problem about SEO, gaming the YouTube algorithm, or popping thumbnails. It's a problem about content.

I really think your issue is that half hour long videos from a small channel who have yet to solidify himself in a niche content corner as a proficient content creator are daunting for people to watch, especially when they want to sit down and find something entertaining. Why should they watch your 30 minute video on game lore when they could, instead, go to a YouTube channel like The Game Theorists, FudgeMuppet, or MrRhexx? You're not offering something unique and when new viewers see this, unless they're adventurous, they'll just pop off to one of these channels for a guaranteed good video.

You either prove to the viewer in the first two minutes of your videos (when it appears people click away) that you are in fact different and that it is worth their time to take a risk on you. Right now, you don't do that.

Do I get it now?
 
Is there any objective evidence that smaller channels should make short videos? Do you have a source for this?
 
Yup, here you go:

Joking aside, no. But looking through your videos, you're not stranger to changing up how you do videos to see if improves your channel


see:

If you're honestly looking on how to improve viewer engagement, there is no magical answer. You'll have to try things out.
 
If the problem is that the videos are too long, how come I still get this problem with this video:

What do you want me to say?

That video is literally a minute long and people click away within seconds of opening it.

So what's happening in those critical first few seconds?

The video is revealed to be "Youtube Poop", a type of video popular in 2013 that has since died off and been tossed in the same category as rage face comics when it comes to humor that has not stood the test of time.

31d6ea0dc7889400941d91b020c7288f.png

People clicked away because they were simply just not interested in the video.

I'll walk you through what an average user experience would, hypothetically, be like:

>be me, browsing youtube
>see video titled, "Kerry Hopkins tells the truth"
>think "who's that, it looks like she's in a court room"
>click video thinking it will tell me
>it's immediately revealed to just be a minute of sharply spliced dialogue clips to make her say dumb things
>click away


Don't get me wrong, I like the content of your videos. I love TES and FO lore- I think its very interesting. I love explanation videos that get me immersed in said lore. I'm sure there are also people who would love all your content. There IS an audience for you, but there are inherit flaws in how you're attracting them.
 
Okay, so sorry for the double post mods.

so i realize this hasn't been entirely helpful for you, and instead of just leaving this as a back-and-forth rant thread, I decided to do something to help out :)
(ignore the thumbnail)
please give it a watch in its entirety :)
 
What do you want me to say?

That video is literally a minute long and people click away within seconds of opening it.

So what's happening in those critical first few seconds?

The video is revealed to be "Youtube Poop", a type of video popular in 2013 that has since died off and been tossed in the same category as rage face comics when it comes to humor that has not stood the test of time.

People clicked away because they were simply just not interested in the video.
Then how come the problem isn't unique to that video?

Okay, so sorry for the double post mods.

so i realize this hasn't been entirely helpful for you, and instead of just leaving this as a back-and-forth rant thread, I decided to do something to help out :)
(ignore the thumbnail)
please give it a watch in its entirety :)
I can't watch the video. It's private. It needs to be either public or unlisted for me to be able to see it.
 
Back
Top