Yeah, I did music in school, so I know a bit about it. The main differences is the development of the orchestra, in the Baroque period there was no piano, and not many instruments, so everything sounded rather bland, as there'd not be much in it, plus everything was mostly stringed instruments. Instead of a piano, a harpsichord was used, and the harpsichord has a unique sounds and where a piano hits strings with a hammer, a harpsichord plucks them, giving a very empty sound. Then as it progressed towards the classical era, brass and woodwind instruments grew, and the strings sections doubled, giving a fuller sound. Also, the harpsichord was replaced by the piano over time, also contributing to the fuller sound. As we approached the romantic period, everything doubled in size again, and it became a lot "grander", as there were so man instruments in an orchestra. Plus, percussion really grew in this transition, giving birth to the use of things like timpani drums and cymbals, really giving a very dramatic and grand feel. Also, fun fact, but because in the Baroque period, strings were dominant, the string section didn't like seeing the other sections growing, as they liked being on top. This led to them coming up with more and more complicated string parts as they wanted to still be on top, which is the reason Beethoven's stuff sounds much grander than Bach's stuff, its was all a competition for dominance.[DOUBLEPOST=1403554124,1403554104][/DOUBLEPOST]Music Lesson 101 here