No, he asked about very specific sound effects that he already has and the copyright issues surrounding that use. If it is too much to ask that in the copyright forum of all places you actually read a posters questions before responding with such drivel, then perhaps this isn't the right sub-forum for you to pad your post count in.[DOUBLEPOST=1440599741,1440599541][/DOUBLEPOST]
The lawyer is essentially correct, as you would expect. The tricky thing is that in order to claim fair use, you need to familiarize yourself with the definition of Parody. A lot of people assume it means funny, or comedic, but that's not what it means in copyright law. Very specifically, it means that you are using the copyrighted material in order to ridicule or make fun of something directly related to the copyrighted material itself. This makes the use of the material justifiable in the the courts because it makes sense that you would need to use some similar copyrighted stuff to do that ridiculing. Just using them to make a funny unrelated video is called Satire, and not protected under Fair Use.