We are the hits cover song network

[WilliamRayWalters]

I beg to differ with you, and for the last time, as I don't have time for trolls.

Many times I've wondered why a person would resort to name-calling rather than trying to explain their position logically. Now I'm beginning to realize that in most of those cases there was not much logic to their position to explain.

Take care.

 

[offbeatbryce]

Many times I've wondered why a person would resort to name-calling rather than trying to explain their position logically. Now I'm beginning to realize that in most of those cases there was not much logic to their position to explain.

Take care.

GUESS WHAT??? We are The Hits claimed the concert recordings. LOOK

 

[UKHypnotist]

But what you are not understanding is WATH gives you the license. They have a list of songs that you can use that they have the license for. You upload your video to WATH website. It enters their Content ID database. Then it gets set to your video you upload. You as the YouTube USER does not monetize it. The network monetizes it. YouTube sends a monthly report of earnings from all channels associated with Network. Then the Network pays the channels the split fee between YouTube user and publishers. Even Sony's Vice President confirmed this in an email I received from the. WATH has deals with Sony, Warner, Kobalt, Universal.


For the songs not listed on WATH the original publishers are what are claimed via Contend ID. You can either share in revenue with YouTube if publisher allow. The only way to never have a cover taken down is to use only the songs listed via WATH. Until YouTube has their own list of songs that clearly say "Monetizable for Covers" Then you don't know what you can upload.

So it's somewhat similar to what TuneCore and CDBaby do, only they are a YouTube network. I hope it works out for you.

@WilliamRayWalters And I have always wondered about people who deny logic when it sits right in front of their faces; and then use that denial to continue to beat a dead horse which has begun to both decay and stink.

Netiquette definition of a troll: "An "Internet troll" or "Forum Troll" or "Message Board Troll" is a person who posts outrageous message to bait people to answer. Forum Troll delights in sowing discord on the forums. A troll is someone who inspires flaming rhetoric, someone who is purposely provoking and pulling people into flaming discussion. Flaming discussions usually end with name calling and a flame war."

I myself tried to put an end to the back and forth between the two of us no less than three times. You would reply each time, with something designed to goad me into another answer.

Now leave off; as you can goad all you wish to this time: I will not answer further!