Screw Maker Studios/RPM Network

Lol do commentary over black ops or black ops 2 without a gaming licensed network and when you get the copyright strike, then tell them what you just told me. Also i never said there was a reason to drop anyone, didnt i say "Imma leave it at that?" XD

I have over 100 commentated videos never had a strike, nor most of gaming youtubers, everything with the purpose of teaching that includes a commnetary is fair use and about 95% of networks will accept you without hesitation. So many people on this thread already tried to teach you, dont embarras yourself more pls.
 
I have over 100 commentated videos never had a strike, nor most of gaming youtubers, everything with the purpose of teaching that includes a commnetary is fair use and about 95% of networks will accept you without hesitation. So many people on this thread already tried to teach you, dont embarras yourself more pls.
What? first off its spelt embarrass , second fair use protects you from nothing, if the original creator does not want it up, they will take it down, its simple.

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair.

  1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
  2. The nature of the copyrighted work
  3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
  4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between what is fair use and what is infringement in a particular case will not always be clear or easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way authors have expressed themselves. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in a work.

The safest course is to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.

When it is impracticable to obtain permission, you should consider avoiding the use of copyrighted material unless you are confident that the doctrine of fair use would apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine whether a particular use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.

Read up.
 
What? first off its spelt embarrass , second fair use protects you from nothing, if the original creator does not want it up, they will take it down, its simple.

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair.

  1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
  2. The nature of the copyrighted work
  3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
  4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between what is fair use and what is infringement in a particular case will not always be clear or easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way authors have expressed themselves. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in a work.

The safest course is to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.

When it is impracticable to obtain permission, you should consider avoiding the use of copyrighted material unless you are confident that the doctrine of fair use would apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine whether a particular use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.

Read up.

Nice copy pasterino. Btw i already told you english wasnt my main language, going for spelling mistakes as your backup plan is always sad to see...
 
Nice copy pasterino. Btw i already told you english wasnt my main language, going for spelling mistakes as your backup plan is always sad to see...
wasn't a back up plan, i fixed the word for you because you said you didnt speak english, either way i won the argument by stating facts over your opinions. You have a nice day sir ^^.
 
I have over 100 commentated videos never had a strike, nor most of gaming youtubers, everything with the purpose of teaching that includes a commnetary is fair use and about 95% of networks will accept you without hesitation. So many people on this thread already tried to teach you, dont embarras yourself more pls.

I have almost 800 video's. All of them no commentary and never had problems or strikes. When i got partnered with TGN they say it is fine to upload no commentary video's. I believe it was stated in their handbooks!

I know RPM doesn't allow no commentary so the OP got screwed i think.
 
You sir are wrong.

Commentary gaming fells under Fair Use Act. Also RPM claims they have licenses and having gaming content is not an issue for them to sign you. So just because he uploads videogames doesn't mean it was a good reason to drop him out.

Pd: English is not my main language.
Number one rule of fair use, if the company says it doesn't fall under it then it doesn't.
So when it comes down to court, "fair use" will get you nowhere :p
 
I have almost 800 video's. All of them no commentary and never had problems or strikes. When i got partnered with TGN they say it is fine to upload no commentary video's. I believe it was stated in their handbooks!

I know RPM doesn't allow no commentary so the OP got screwed i think.

They doesn't allow it so yeah he got screwed *came from one of recruiter that I talked*. It seems they become strict or something lol
 
Even though Machinima would not of been my choice of network i think that is great that you were accepted!
About RPM , i have found them to be a great network with no problems at all but i guess stuff is better for some people than others!
 
Back
Top