50% of $100 its more than 80% of $55... and gross mean before youtube cut the taxes, otherwise it would be "net revenue"
50% of $100 its more than 80% of $55... and gross mean before youtube cut the taxes, otherwise it would be "net revenue"
I think he thinks the 80/20 split is network/user. In that case he is correct, a user getting 50/50 is better than 80/20What on earth are you talking about? YouTube ALWAYS takes 45% first, meaning that in your example Bent Pixels 50% would be of 55$ thus making it $27.50 which is far less than zoomins 80%. The 50% and 80% are both of the same pot of money , I'll give you an example for both networks:
You earn 100$ Gross revenue with Zoomin tv, YouTube takes 45% leaving you with 55$ , Zoomin TV then take 20% leaving you with ($55 x 0.8) = $44
You earn 100$ Gross with Bent Pixels, YouTube takes 45% leaving you with $55, Bent Pixels then take 50% leaving you with ($55 x 0.5) = $27.5
I think he thinks the 80/20 split is network/user. In that case he is correct, a user getting 50/50 is better than 80/20
What? YouTube takes its % first and then the network takes its %, the 50% Bent Pixels offer is 30% lower than the 80% zoomin tv offer, both are %'s of revenue after youtubes cut. Not sure how he thinks getting 50% is better than getting 80%..? no matter what network you are with YouTube takes its 45% first.
Working out the numbers, the break even point between the two networks would require Bent Pixels to have a CPM 37.5% higher than Zoomin for the partner to earn the same amount.Which while possible, is unlikely in an averaging situation. heh
No not getting 80%, getting 20%= network gets 80% out of the split. Idk how else I could try to clarify it. Okay let's sa there is a box of pizza, if you split it between two people 50/50 it'd be a crappier split for an 80/20 split ( the user being the 20%)
I'm even confused now lol.