Fullscreen Logic

Fullscreen used to be quite a tricky one to get into, you had to have 750+ views daily and great content in order to get accepted under that number. But now they accept anyone, with zero views (just like all networks)
 
Fullscreen is getting hungry for money and accept everyone unless you have any strikes.

People have been bashing RPM, AwsomenessTV and praising Fullscreen. But from what I've heard their contracts are a lot worse than RPM and their forums are horrible.
 
I'm still a little leery on the fullscreen thing. Other than the fact that they protect you from getting botted and let you monetize certain copywrite material I don't really see the appeal but then again I'm not really at that stage anyway. I think it would be really cool to make music videos for bands and not get in trouble for it though. Also, WWE. If there is a network that lets you monetize WWE content I'd sign up in a second. I'd pay to join actually.
 
Willsrobs said:
So as some of you may know, I got into fullscreen, more so asked to join Fullscreen GO till I fit a sub network. What I don't get is that there are people who are bigger with more views or subscribes and they get rejected. I don't understand why. Maybe someone can enlighten me on fullscreen's logic. Just curios is all.
Click to expand...


Fullscreen seems to heavily focused on their verticals (hubs) now and are pouring in a ton of money to build them. It could be that they are more selective if your channel doesn't fit one of those hubs. We weren't placed in a hub until recently-now our contract and the majority of our perks come from that hub, so if the hub can't benefit working with us and we can't benefit from working with the hub, there's really no reason to be with Fullscreen. I'm sure they take the same thinking into account when reviewing channels for partnership.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top