What's your definition of 'good content'?
- Thread starter Rachael
- Start date
Nikki120113
YTTalk's Cookie Pizza
Definitely something entertaining, it also has to be funny to some degree (who wants to watch serious boring videos all the time?) & yes something your viewers can relate to but that depends on what kind of channel you are 
also quality of the videos (audio/lighting/general video quality).
also quality of the videos (audio/lighting/general video quality).
Switchbox
Give me your food
Quality content is when someone does their best to make a great video, and that it can really show that they have made a lot of effort with the video. (Wheter it is good commentary, great editing skills etc.)
We don't make quality content.
Because then we wouldn't have any fun with what we're doing, and we would have to be like all formal and decent and stuff, and we would have to apply a filter :c
And I don't care if we don't get any views and stuff if we're not having fun with what we're doing. I don't want to be anyone else. I want to say vulgar stuff whenever I want to.
Because that's how I am usually around my closest friends.
We don't make quality content.
Because then we wouldn't have any fun with what we're doing, and we would have to be like all formal and decent and stuff, and we would have to apply a filter :c
And I don't care if we don't get any views and stuff if we're not having fun with what we're doing. I don't want to be anyone else. I want to say vulgar stuff whenever I want to.
Because that's how I am usually around my closest friends.
Lightsen
Animation Yey!
someone can have the best quality equipment, amazing editing, jokes etc. but if I don't get anything from it I wouldn't class it as good content. may be quality, but for me, not good.
yet someone may have the worse mic ever, a dog barking in the BG, some MS paint drawings and forget to cut the last 15 seconds of black from the end of the vid, and if I gain something from it, A laugh, some gameplay I wanted, something new, or interesting, then it is good content. Maybe not high quality like the first example, but it doesn't stop me from calling it a good video.
yet someone may have the worse mic ever, a dog barking in the BG, some MS paint drawings and forget to cut the last 15 seconds of black from the end of the vid, and if I gain something from it, A laugh, some gameplay I wanted, something new, or interesting, then it is good content. Maybe not high quality like the first example, but it doesn't stop me from calling it a good video.
Beastby
Designer, gamer, lion tamer
I like it when someone goes the extra mile with editing as they can further improve the video but It's more about what the person says or does that beats any amount of editing 
If the core of the video is solid then all of the fluff surrounding is just icing on the cake.
If the core of the video is solid then all of the fluff surrounding is just icing on the cake.
SteaksTV
Active Member
When I think of Quality videos, I think the videos have to be "Worth" watching, compared to other videos
As a viewer you have to get something out of it. It can be a good laugh, entertainment,you learned something, or you got another perspective to a subject.
So, when you are done watching the video, you feel that it was worth to watch.
As a viewer you have to get something out of it. It can be a good laugh, entertainment,you learned something, or you got another perspective to a subject.
So, when you are done watching the video, you feel that it was worth to watch.