wall street journal ruined youtube

Scotty Byrd

Scotty Byrd

Well-Known Member
lets be honest wall street journal and their b******t article have lead to where youtube is today so we should just boycott wall street journal !!
 
Then again, I wonder what would have happened if Youtube continued the way it was before. I guess change would have happened sooner or later. If Wall Street Journal wouldn´t attacked Pewdiepie, they would have attacked someone else!
 
TheSwedishTraveler said:
Then again, I wonder what would have happened if Youtube continued the way it was before. I guess change would have happened sooner or later. If Wall Street Journal wouldn´t attacked Pewdiepie, they would have attacked someone else!
Click to expand...

i agree they would have found one but they literally just framed pewdiepie lol like they took everything out of context and basically rallied up the ad companies to crack down lol either way i have no respect for wall street journal
 
Both parties are to blame, to be honest. Also, if WSJ didn't say anything another publication would have.
 
Mcrocks9 said:
Both parties are to blame, to be honest. Also, if WSJ didn't say anything another publication would have.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. People have been making offensive jokes on YouTube since the beginning. PewDiePie's made egdy jokes since the very beginning. That's how he grew his following. People enjoy his humor. What makes WSJ the malicious party in this is that they went directly to brands, taking his humor out of context and pushing them into a corner to take action. Which is against the journalist code of ethics. Journalists are supposed to minimize harm and should have went to him first as a source. They went out of their way to cause harm.
 
Dewmonic Abyss said:
Not necessarily. People have been making offensive jokes on YouTube since the beginning. PewDiePie's made egdy jokes since the very beginning. That's how he grew his following. People enjoy his humor. What makes WSJ the malicious party in this is that they went directly to brands, taking his humor out of context and pushing them into a corner to take action. Which is against the journalist code of ethics. Journalists are supposed to minimize harm and should have went to him first as a source. They went out of their way to cause harm.
Click to expand...

they went on a witch hunt !![DOUBLEPOST=1517153160,1517153118][/DOUBLEPOST]
Life of a Film maker said:
Yea screw the WSJ. May they burn in hell
Click to expand...

i subbed lol !! im anti wsj
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top