Extreemer162
Liking YTtalk
Hello everyone,
I want to ask you to give your opinions about Purity Network ! Thanks !
I want to ask you to give your opinions about Purity Network ! Thanks !
Purity Network!
- Thread starter Extreemer162
- Start date
Rails2Revolution
Super Poster
99% cut sounds interesting. Makes me wonder why they'd bother contracting with a channel when it cost them more money to hire the staff that partners them. Ah well. I guess revenue is revenue.
Other than that doesn't seem like much else special. They offer all the usual suspects, epoxy, music, thumbnails, "support" some washed out dashboard. Since you're asking purely for opinions mine would be that it wouldn't be offering me anything that I couldn't get myself and that I wouldn't be able to justify joining them.
Other than that doesn't seem like much else special. They offer all the usual suspects, epoxy, music, thumbnails, "support" some washed out dashboard. Since you're asking purely for opinions mine would be that it wouldn't be offering me anything that I couldn't get myself and that I wouldn't be able to justify joining them.
CousinEd
There's always a choice
Copy paste from their homepage: "All clients of Purity Network keep anything between 60% – 99% of all revenue generated on their assets through us!" so 60/40 it is. Still, I would ask for a draft contract for educational purposes. All the stuff they have advertised on their home page doesn't mean anything if it's not written on paper.
Shane
YouTube Network Addict
Looks alright.. Their dashboard looks pretty under-average / horrible ux/ui from the picture on their site.
If you need a network, I'd say there's plenty of alternatives that would likely give you a better deal.[DOUBLEPOST=1466190048,1466163153][/DOUBLEPOST]
Their tends to be two types of networks for large channels, those that do sales (media/ instream and/or sponsored/branded-content) and those that don't do sales.
For MCNs that do, do sales, 100% of YouTube/Adsense-sold revenue (and them only taking a % of revenue from ads sold by them) is not un-usual at all with channels that have 5M+ views each month.
For MCNs that don't, do sales (likely 90%+ of all MCNs), they tend to stick to 95% or below because when you factor 2-3% for payment fees you need to get at-least 97-98% to break-even, not factoring in paying for other features such as music etc which tend to be around $1-$5 per channel per service.
I doubt they're the first option as most small MCNs don't do sales and if they did, they'd likely say they can do 100% to be more competitive.
Which means they likely are the second type of MCN and either:
i) Choose to make a loss on big channels in return for getting to say that channel is in their network / PR reasons.
ii) Don't ever offer 99% and are just lying on their website to make it look better.
iii) Haven't factored payment fees, staff wages + service fees into their expenses on a per channel basis and think 1% will make them some money and will be better than getting 0% of that channel when actually they would very likely be losing money.
If you need a network, I'd say there's plenty of alternatives that would likely give you a better deal.[DOUBLEPOST=1466190048,1466163153][/DOUBLEPOST]
It likely means they either don't offer the 99%, are fine with taking a loss or they can't do basic maths
Their tends to be two types of networks for large channels, those that do sales (media/ instream and/or sponsored/branded-content) and those that don't do sales.
For MCNs that do, do sales, 100% of YouTube/Adsense-sold revenue (and them only taking a % of revenue from ads sold by them) is not un-usual at all with channels that have 5M+ views each month.
For MCNs that don't, do sales (likely 90%+ of all MCNs), they tend to stick to 95% or below because when you factor 2-3% for payment fees you need to get at-least 97-98% to break-even, not factoring in paying for other features such as music etc which tend to be around $1-$5 per channel per service.
I doubt they're the first option as most small MCNs don't do sales and if they did, they'd likely say they can do 100% to be more competitive.
Which means they likely are the second type of MCN and either:
i) Choose to make a loss on big channels in return for getting to say that channel is in their network / PR reasons.
ii) Don't ever offer 99% and are just lying on their website to make it look better.
iii) Haven't factored payment fees, staff wages + service fees into their expenses on a per channel basis and think 1% will make them some money and will be better than getting 0% of that channel when actually they would very likely be losing money.