TONS of False 3rd Party Claims Lately

Munchito696

I Love YTtalk
I've had a TON of these false claims lately, getting them released is like trying to close popups these days, I have resolved all but two, most are for audio that I am supposed to be able to use as a Fullscreen member. One for some reason Audiomicro can't remove the claim from which is BS. NOW I have Rumble claiming a video of mine that I uploaded to Rumble about a year and I half ago, I still haven't heard back from them yet. This s**t is starting to p**s me off, I think it's an automatic feature of YouTube, at least this is what Audio Micro and Fullscreen seem to think. Is this happening to anybody else? These are videos that have been monetized for a while now too, it's not like I just uploaded them a month ago, the one Rumble is claiming has been on my channel since 2008!
 
Havent happened to me since i make my own lol. Actually the ppl who have ever used my stuff without my permission r about to get p****d cuz my content ID is about to get activated soon :sneaky2:
 
Havent happened to me since i make my own lol. Actually the ppl who have ever used my stuff without my permission r about to get p****d cuz my content ID is about to get activated soon :sneaky2:
I don't see how rumble is claiming a video that was on YouTube before rumble was even a thought.
 
How'd you rig that?
i get my content ID through help of BeatStars and SoundCloud its only for music artists and producers like myself they'll send out all of my music that i've created and uploaded to YouTube for content ID and whitelist my own channel so it doesn't get claimed. its only gonna be audio no visual cuz i don't need visual content ID anyway.

if you're not an artist or producer i believe you can get content ID from youtube by filling out a form as well i was once on it but it just looked like too much work.
 
Havent happened to me since i make my own lol. Actually the ppl who have ever used my stuff without my permission r about to get p****d cuz my content ID is about to get activated soon :sneaky2:
You are aware of course that you must hold sole rights in something like 200-2000 video or audio units to even get into the Content ID System as a rights holder, are you not?

Sole rights mean that no one else but you has the right to use the material submitted to the Fingerprint Database. Royalty-free material on a non-exclusive license is inelligible. So if you are mixing using loops from a non-exclusive RF library, though you have an original mix it will contain non-eligible elements.
i get my content ID through help of BeatStars and SoundCloud its only for music artists and producers like myself they'll send out all of my music that i've created and uploaded to YouTube for content ID and whitelist my own channel so it doesn't get claimed. its only gonna be audio no visual cuz i don't need visual content ID anyway.

if you're not an artist or producer i believe you can get content ID from youtube by filling out a form as well i was once on it but it just looked like too much work.

That form you mentioned has the restrictions I mentioned in my original text above. This isn't your personal Content ID; you are riding on a bigger fish's back. I hope it works out for you, as the same things I said above apply. If you are using non-exclusive content in your music it may not belong there.
 
You are aware of course that you must hold sole rights in something like 200-2000 video or audio units to even get into the Content ID System as a rights holder, are you not?

Sole rights mean that no one else but you has the right to use the material submitted to the Fingerprint Database. Royalty-free material on a non-exclusive license is inelligible. So if you are mixing using loops from a non-exclusive RF library, though you have an original mix it will contain non-eligible elements.


That form you mentioned has the restrictions I mentioned in my original text above. This isn't your personal Content ID; you are riding on a bigger fish's back. I hope it works out for you, as the same things I said above apply. If you are using non-exclusive content in your music it may not belong there.
i got my shiii backed up by BeatStars so i do have my own Content ID and i see every damn video that uses my audio and every user and i get all the ad revenue or i can take the video down but im smarter than that. And obviously i own all the rights. I produce the music. Not only do i have Content ID for YouTube but for SoundCloud as well.
 
Last edited:
i got my shiii backed up by BeatStars so i do have my own Content ID and i see every damn video that uses my audio and every user and i get all the ad revenue or i can take the video down but im smarter than that. And obviously i own all the rights. I produce the music. Not only do i have Content ID for YouTube but for SoundCloud as well.

Composition and production are usually related, but not necessarily the same thing. Production can be accomplished using pre-existing beats and music loops; which would mean the Content ID system might match something similar but not completely the same as your music. If the accused YouTuber doesn't dispute, you might earn money on a piece you have no rights-entitlement in. This is why I don't agree with the Content ID system as it exists today. Twice this week, I had to dispute claims where the matched music piece bore no resemblance to my own.

I just took a close look at Beatstars also; it is much like Tunecore or Rumblefish, except for the fact it seems to be a one-stop collaboration community as well as a distribution/rights managing outlet. I cannot use such a service; one Content ID against my own distributed works would invalidate my contract with Shockwave Sound.

Unlike youself, I compose/produce soundscapes for Royalty-Free Distribution.
 
Back
Top