drb1966
New Member
I recently received a copyright claim regarding :31 seconds of intro music edited for me by a 3rd. party. I take no issue at all giving credit to someone artistic/creative work. I noticed in the claim that it notes that the video is now 'monetized by the claimant' and may include ads. I fine with ads, as I had it monetized prior to the claim.
My question is now that the claim is made is the claimant benefitting from the ads 100%? Granite, I know its pennies and not a huge loss financially on my end.
The music is 31 seconds of a 6 minute video, less than 10% so shouldn't the financial aspect of the ad monetization be proportionate to the percentage of content creation?
If the claimant receives 100% of the monetization, then it makes better business sense to dump the 31 seconds as the claimant is now benefitting for the remaining 90% of content. What am I missing? Thanks
My question is now that the claim is made is the claimant benefitting from the ads 100%? Granite, I know its pennies and not a huge loss financially on my end.
The music is 31 seconds of a 6 minute video, less than 10% so shouldn't the financial aspect of the ad monetization be proportionate to the percentage of content creation?
If the claimant receives 100% of the monetization, then it makes better business sense to dump the 31 seconds as the claimant is now benefitting for the remaining 90% of content. What am I missing? Thanks