Gabriel
YouTube Addict
What's your point?But he's a gaming channel. he never owns the game, he never made them, he just plays them. So it's best to be with a network.
What's your point?But he's a gaming channel. he never owns the game, he never made them, he just plays them. So it's best to be with a network.
I think he's been fooled by a lot of the people that say "omg you can't monetize with youtube1! you get strikes, blah, blah, blah"...unfortunately.Why don't we just take a moment and think...this dude has 86k subs and 10mil views, but didn't know he could partner with YouTube?
Seems legit.
What's your point?
Yes, they have been for aeons.Is YouTube partnering gaming channels now?
Why don't we just take a moment and think...this dude has 86k subs and 10mil views, but didn't know he could partner with YouTube?
Seems legit.
You didn't tell us who your previous network was, which gives us no basis for comparison. In many cases due to the Standard Instream ads that only network and legacy partners have access to, with a high enough revenue share, it is a superior situation financially to partner with one of the MCNs. This is not always the case however. No network that I'm aware of is capable of increasing CPM enough to generate an increase in revenue at anything below a 70/30 revenue share.
You could always upload and monetize gameplay. Networks do nothing in regards to gaming material.Is YouTube partnering gaming channels now?
Your statement of ''bigger partners have less issues monetizing'' is a bit ambiguous.You could always upload and monetize gameplay. Networks do nothing in regards to gaming material.