"Has to"? Why does it "have to"? :-/ Are there any networks who don't?Your Network has to un-partner you.
No. Every network is the same with copyright. Because the network doesn't want/condone any of it's partners to have copyrighted content , if they let it slide they could be taken to court or it could lead to BIG legal matters, which is the last thing that they want !"Has to"? Why does it "have to"? :-/ Are there any networks who don't?
Those type of youtubers are BIG & youtube/the networks works with them to help them remove those strikes (cause big youtubers are a money maker for youtube& their network. It's kinda unfairOh man... This is sooo confusing... I keep doing research and find out about all these big youtubers, like Ray William Johnson, Michael Buckley and I think even Shane Dawson who had copyright strikes and videos taken down at some point, and they were still partnered afterwards. They didn't have to wait for the strike to be lifted.
And if you were partnered with YouTube directly, not through a network, and you got a copyright strike, would you still be able to earn from your next videos, before the strike was lifted?
Most networks want to keep a good reputation with YouTube and keep little to none channels with copyright strikes."Has to"? Why does it "have to"? :-/ Are there any networks who don't?