Does everyone hate the new Beta Studio as much as me?

Xynudu said:
Why do they insist on changing things when the old version works fine ?
Click to expand...

Google created a design language called Material Design, it was developed as a framework for mobile and web use. It's been around for some years now.

So they decided to make it law for it to be used across all their web, mobile and desktop applications. It's already in Chrome, Gmail (et al), search engine tools and apps, and well now incoming to YT Studio.

In itself, it's not actually bad, the problem is the implementation of the design per case has not been smooth and riddled with issues.
 
I have no issues with the layout of the new Beta Studio. I do hate the occasional errors, something could not be saved, etc. At first I was also struggling to find functions but I am ok with it now.
 
ttxela said:
I'm not a great fan of it and still go to the classic as a preference. Is there anything you can do in the new version that you couldn't do in classic?
Click to expand...

I don't know. Just saw last night that there is some sort of editor. I have not tried it to see what it can do though, and I do not know how it will affect a video.
 
The feature I hate on the "studio beta" is the "insert midroll ads" screen. It was very easy to find and very simple to use in the "old studio" but very hard to find and use in the new one.


zerocache said:
Google created a design language called Material Design, it was developed as a framework for mobile and web use. It's been around for some years now.

So they decided to make it law for it to be used across all their web, mobile and desktop applications. It's already in Chrome, Gmail (et al), search engine tools and apps, and well now incoming to YT Studio.
Click to expand...

That explains why they changed their "search console" for website owners. Those of you who run a website will be familiar with it. It's the same thing there. They are running 2 versions of the same software in parallel and you have to keep flipping between them because neither version does everything during the migration process lol.
 
Crown said:
The feature I hate on the "studio beta" is the "insert midroll ads" screen. It was very easy to find and very simple to use in the "old studio" but very hard to find and use in the new one.




That explains why they changed their "search console" for website owners. Those of you who run a website will be familiar with it. It's the same thing there. They are running 2 versions of the same software in parallel and you have to keep flipping between them because neither version does everything during the migration process lol.
Click to expand...

It was annoying and a major pain in the proverbial backside. It was buggy as hell, and it would constantly send out notifications when there was nothing wrong, and I would get a barrage of questions the next day from worried clients. Thankfully, it came to an end.
 
I'm not a fan of it as well. I gave it a few tries but I didn't find stuff as easy as with the old studio. Maybe with some more time I'll get used to it, but I definitely prefer the old version.
 
I prefer the Dashboard of the classic, but do like the 'current vid compared to average' on the beta dashboard (I am sure that is not what that is called ha ha). I love the analytics in beta. So much more info and layed out very well... after a little learning curve.

My biggest complaint about both classic and beta is the horrible comment management. The main thing I use TubeBuddy for is the sorting of comments (need reply, has question, needs follow up, etc). That is not a beta problem, just a YT problem.

Overall I am satisfied with the progress of the beta - I just hope they keep classic around until the beta is actually finished...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top